I-CARE: Analysis of interference-related phenomena in a controllable, diverse and representative unlearning setting for text-to-image models
On the map: LLM safety and security → Vision-language and text-to-image safety
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine unlearning studies the removal of knowledge from an AI model, making the system forget a concept it previously learned. Despite rapid progress in generative machine unlearning, the unintended degradation of semantically related concepts that should have been retained (henceforth, interference) remains poorly characterized and inconsistently evaluated. This paper introduces I-CARE, a methodology that formalizes interference as a first-class object of study in generative unlearning. Rather than proposing a new benchmark or unlearning algorithm, I-CARE provides formal definitions for tasks, metrics, and templates for reporting results, enabling the systematic and reproducible study of interference across unlearning settings. While our methodology is designed to remain valid as models and unlearning algorithms evolve, decoupling long-term scientific insight from transient empirical results, we present a feasibility demonstration with state-of-the-art algorithms and frequently used datasets. The results demonstrate that I-CARE enables meaningful analysis of interference patterns across multiple unlearning settings, establishing the practical applicability of the framework. The software implementation of the methodology is provided in an open-source framework, together with a web-based graphical interface that enables exploration of the outcomes of this study without requiring direct interaction with the codebase or specialized data analysis tools.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Vision-language and text-to-image safety, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 11 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.
Builds on
11 of 59 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026SPARE: Self-distillation for PARameter-Efficient Removal4 Feb
- 2024Holistic Unlearning Benchmark: A Multi-Faceted Evaluation for Text-to-Image Diffusion Model Unlearning8 Oct
Other references · 9
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2023Unified Concept Editing in Diffusion Modelscited by 388
- 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generationcited by 386
- 2022Sources of Irreproducibility in Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 32
- 2018A Large-scale Attribute Dataset for Zero-shot Learningcited by 21
- 2026Mechanistic Analysis of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 14
- 2025More Rigorous Software Engineering Would Improve Reproducibility in Machine Learning Researchcited by 2
- 2024Unlearning-based Neural Interpretationscited by 1
- 2025Spec-Driven AI for Science: The ARIA Framework for Automated and Reproducible Data Analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026eval-unlearn: Benchmarking unlearning in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
- 2025Generative Model Unlearning: A Survey through Target Events, Unlearning Operators, and Evaluation Protocols
- 2025Rethinking Machine Unlearning in Image Generation Models
- 2024UnUnlearning: Unlearning is not sufficient for content regulation in advanced generative AI
- 2026Why Instruction-Based Unlearning Fails in Diffusion Models?
- 2025Continual Unlearning for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models: A Regularization Perspective
- 2025Reference-Specific Unlearning Metrics Can Hide the Truth: A Reality Check
- 2026Erasure or Erosion? Evaluating Compositional Degradation in Unlearned Text-To-Image Diffusion Models