Verbalizing Multi-Token Concepts in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lens methods inspect model computation by mapping intermediate activations to vocabulary tokens. Yet the concepts humans need to read out often span multiple tokens---entities, phrases, intermediate objects---making token-level readouts incomplete. Reliable multi-token readout with little model-specific preparation remains challenging. We introduce Concept Lens: token-level lens clues guide candidate concept search, then the model derives a representation for each candidate and scores it against the original activation. Across 2,400 multi-hop clozes on five LLMs (8B--70B), Concept Lens instantiated with J-lens and R-lens achieves average Rank@10 scores of 36.6% and 54.5%, respectively, compared with 21.7% for Template Lens. Concept-swap interventions on derived concept representations shift model answers toward those associated with the replacement concepts. Further experiments show that Concept Lens can also reveal what a model recognizes along the way, beyond what appears in its final answer. Our code is available at https://github.com/XijieGo/c-lens
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.
Builds on
9 of 34 references.
References · 9
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2026Emergent Introspective Awareness in Large Language Modelscited by 82
- 2026Can LLMs Introspect? A Reality Checkcited by 12
- 2026Faithful-Patchscopes: Understanding and Mitigating Model Bias in Hidden Representations Explanation of Large Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.