mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Branch Geometry and Finite-Radius Sensitivity of Hard-ReLU Training

arXiv 2608.30960 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Outer-learning algorithms use infinitesimal sensitivities to propose finite changes to initialization or training parameters. For hard-ReLU training, the derivative of the finite program and the derivative of its flow limit do not by themselves specify the response at a chosen radius. We characterize the intervening regime in which the perturbation radius is proportional to the GD step. Integer event rounding then survives at leading order: smooth Euler bias shifts each discrete phase, and upstream rounding moves downstream branch boundaries. We derive the crossing indices and a uniform endpoint expansion for finitely many separated transverse events in piecewise-C2 dynamics, away from recursive phase boundaries. In contractive affine regions, an explicit remainder and complete branch verification certify finite candidate comparisons. Scalar phase frequencies and a coupled feedback ablation test the mechanism; frozen nonlinear-network experiments show radius-dependent prediction accuracy, including incomplete branch matches and failed-word tails. Together with local AD and uniform flow consistency, the result identifies sufficient response regimes: differentiating training is a choice of perturbation resolution as well as a choice of derivative.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

3 of 27 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020A mathematical model for automatic differentiation in machine learningcited by 45
  2. 2026Continuous-Time Piecewise-Linear Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 4
  3. 2023Correcting Auto-Differentiation in Neural-ODE Trainingcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.