Error-Type-Aware Loss Reweighting for Robust Named Entity Recognition with Noisy LLM Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are increasingly used to annotate datasets for training smaller, task-specialized models such as named entity recognition. While this method yields effective models, it assumes that the synthetic dataset is correctly annotated. In this work, we find that (i) current fine-tuning processes simply ignore LLM-introduced annotation noise, resulting in degraded performance and (ii) existing noise-robust losses are not transferable to sequence labeling because annotation noise in named entity recognition is heterogeneous: for example, missing mentions and type errors affect the training signal in different ways. Treating all noisy tokens equally in noise-robust losses and applying a single reweighing criterion for all may therefore remove useful supervision or reinforce incorrect labels. To address this limitation, we propose error-type-aware loss reweighting for NER, which introduces separate reweighing rules for different types of potentially erroneous tokens. Our approach is simple and efficient, does not require additional training resources, and improves F1 by 0.8 - 2.0 percentage points on dataset-level average for noise levels between 15% and 40%, with a maximum improvement of 4.6 percentage points with 24.1% noise on Wikigold.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.
Builds on
18 of 40 references.
References · 18
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
- 2024Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Surveycited by 205
- 2023GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Modelscited by 160
- 2020BOND: BERT-Assisted Open-Domain Named Entity Recognition with Distant Supervisioncited by 91
- 2018Learning Named Entity Tagger using Domain-Specific Dictionarycited by 65
- 2021Distantly-Supervised Named Entity Recognition with Noise-Robust Learning and Language Model Augmented Self-Trainingcited by 41
- 2024NuNER: Entity Recognition Encoder Pre-training via LLM-Annotated Datacited by 34
6 more
- 2024The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representationcited by 29
- 2021Noisy-Labeled NER with Confidence Estimationcited by 28
- 2021Named Entity Recognition with Small Strongly Labeled and Large Weakly Labeled Datacited by 18
- 2023CleanCoNLL: A Nearly Noise-Free Named Entity Recognition Datasetcited by 11
- 2024Re-Examine Distantly Supervised NER: A New Benchmark and a Simple Approachcited by 5
- 2025DynClean: Training Dynamics-based Label Cleaning for Distantly-Supervised Named Entity Recognitioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.