mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ToxLens: A Reproducible Graph-Learning Framework for Leakage-Aware, Uncertainty-Calibrated Molecular Toxicity Prediction

arXiv 2608.30472 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Molecular toxicity prediction is increasingly used to prioritise compounds before experimental testing, but conventional benchmark performance can overstate practical utility when structurally related molecules occur across training and test folds. We introduce ToxLens, a reproducible multi-task graph-learning framework for 11 toxicity endpoints spanning Ames mutagenicity, acute oral toxicity, hERG inhibition, and Tox21 nuclear-receptor and stress-response assays. The workflow combines conservative chemical curation, sphere-exclusion filtering, a leakage-aware UMAP-HDBSCAN split, parallel graph and global-feature encoders joined by late concatenation, temperature-scaled Monte Carlo dropout with conformal-style prediction sets, applicability-domain analysis, and SHAP-guided toxicophore discovery with occlusion controls. On the leakage-controlled test fold, a five-seed soft-voting ensemble achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient score of 0.44, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.83, and an area under the precision-recall curve score of 0.58. It exceeded four ECFP4-based shallow baselines on all 11 endpoints under the same split and validation-based threshold-selection protocol. Controlled ablations showed that the global pathway was important, whereas late concatenation outperformed the tested gated and feature-wise linear modulation fusion variants. Conformal-style prediction sets revealed substantial endpoint-specific variation in set efficiency, and discrimination and calibration improved with similarity to the training domain. Retraining on fixed published Tox21 Challenge and TDA folds produced competitive, but not uniformly state-of-the-art, performance. SHAP-guided occlusion and consensus subgraph mining yielded model-derived structural hypotheses, 44 of which contained at least one occurrence that passed the predefined counterfactual criteria.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

29 of 105 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  6. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  8. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  9. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  10. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  11. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  12. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
17 more
  1. 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,051
  2. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  3. 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 971
  4. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 840
  5. 2015Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprintscited by 754
  6. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
  7. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  8. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  9. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
  10. 2020Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coveragecited by 396
  11. 2019Analyzing Learned Molecular Representations for Property Predictioncited by 375
  12. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
  13. 2020ChemBERTa: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pretraining for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 337
  14. 2016Molecular Graph Convolutions: Moving Beyond Fingerprintscited by 238
  15. 2021Large-Scale Chemical Language Representations Capture Molecular Structure and Propertiescited by 206
  16. 2022Translation between Molecules and Natural Languagecited by 177
  17. 2020Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligencecited by 118

Built on by

Not cited yet.