mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generative multi-domain transfer learning for fault detection in data-scarce wind turbines

arXiv 2608.30323 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Normal behavior models have shown promise for reliable fault detection in wind turbines. However, these unsupervised anomaly detection models require sufficient fault-free training data to learn the normal operation behavior of turbines. Under data scarcity, for example in newly deployed wind turbines, these models may result in poor fault detection performance. In this work, we propose a multi-domain generative domain mapping approach based on Star Generative Adversarial Networks (StarGAN) to improve fault detection on data-scarce wind turbines. Our model maps SCADA measurements from a data-scarce turbine to resemble those of several data-rich turbines. By preserving the operational state during translation, faults occurring in a data-scarce domain can be mapped and detected by reliable pre-trained normal behavior models of data-rich domains. Highlighting the benefits of an ensemble fusion strategy, we show that under severe data scarcity our method can produce anomaly scores comparable to models trained on large representative datasets. Our approach can consistently outperform models trained on scarce data when less than 2 weeks of training data are available. With just 2 weeks of accumulated training data, we achieve an anomaly score similarity that is, on average, +16% higher than conventional fine-tuning, and +10% higher than single-source domain mapping. As a step towards unsupervised model selection, we propose a proxy metric that detects poor performance at training time, despite an absence of anomalies. Our study presents the potential and challenges of multi-domain mapping for wind turbine fault detection under unrepresentative training data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 35 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,476
  2. 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,039
  3. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
  4. 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
  5. 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
  6. 2018Taking A Closer Look at Domain Shift: Category-level Adversaries for Semantics Consistent Domain Adaptationcited by 295
  7. 2017One-Sided Unsupervised Domain Mappingcited by 91
  8. 2019Multi-source Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 74
  9. 2018The Unusual Effectiveness of Averaging in GAN Trainingcited by 73
  10. 2021StarGANv2-VC: A Diverse, Unsupervised, Non-parallel Framework for Natural-Sounding Voice Conversioncited by 58
  11. 2023Can We Evaluate Domain Adaptation Models Without Target-Domain Labels?cited by 14
  12. 2020Anomaly Detection with Domain Adaptationcited by 13
4 more
  1. 2020Multi-target normal behaviour models for wind farm condition monitoringcited by 7
  2. 2018GAN-QP: A Novel GAN Framework without Gradient Vanishing and Lipschitz Constraintcited by 6
  3. 2024Wind turbine condition monitoring based on intra- and inter-farm federated learningcited by 3
  4. 2025Fault Detection in New Wind Turbines with Limited Data by Generative Transfer Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.