mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Representations through Token Prediction: Geometry, Approximation, and Downstream Guarantees

arXiv 2608.30072 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2026stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Token prediction is a central pre-training objective for modern language models. Despite its empirical success, why token prediction learns broadly useful representations remains incompletely understood. We develop a statistical framework connecting token prediction with representation geometry, encoder approximation, and downstream performance. Under a softmax prediction head, we show that accurate token prediction organizes token embeddings according to similarities between the distributions of contexts in which different token types appear, as measured by Hellinger distance, with explicit errors governed by prediction accuracy and token frequency. Meanwhile, the contextual representation provides a low-dimensional coordinate for the conditional distribution of the target token relative to these embeddings. We further introduce a self-consistency principle showing that repeated applications of a shared representation block can progressively refine the contextual representation without introducing additional block parameters. Among representations with the same prediction accuracy, this recurrent construction favors those that can be stably reconstructed from their contexts. Finally, we establish downstream guarantees for token generation, token community recovery, and classification by a linear probe, showing how prediction accuracy and recovered geometry translate into performance beyond the pre-training objective. Together, these results explain how the simple objective of predicting tokens can recover semantic geometry and produce broadly useful representations. A controlled simulation illustrates the theoretical mechanisms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2026.

Builds on

1 of 41 references.

References · 1

  1. 2025On Next-Token Prediction in LLMs: How End Goals Determine the Consistency of Decoding Algorithmscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Context Staircase: Signature-Aligned Dynamics of Token Embeddings under Small Initialization
  2. 2026A Geometric Perspective on Next-Token Prediction in Large Language Models: Three Emerging Phases
  3. 2026NITP: Next Implicit Token Prediction for LLM Pre-training
  4. 2026AdaMTP: An Adaptive Training Paradigm for Multi-Token Prediction
  5. 2025Unraveling Token Prediction Refinement and Identifying Essential Layers in Language Models
  6. 2025Contextual Reinforcement in Multimodal Token Compression for Large Language Models
  7. 2025Bridging the Dimensional Chasm: Uncover Layer-wise Dimensional Reduction in Transformers through Token Correlation
  8. 2024Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction