mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cloud and On-Premises Deployment of Uzbek Legal RAG via Targeted Retriever Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2608.29284 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying large language models for legal question answering raises challenges that general-purpose leaderboards do not capture, particularly for low-resource languages and under hard operational constraints. We report on building and operating a retrieval-augmented (RAG) legal assistant for Uzbek that must run in two regimes: a managed cloud service that maximizes answer quality within a per-token cost ceiling, and an on-premises deployment for clients whose legal data may not leave their infrastructure, restricting us to open-weight models on limited local hardware under latency constraints. Because no evaluation existed for this setting, we build two domain benchmarks: a retrieval benchmark of 178 expert-annotated legal queries with gold provision spans, and an end-to-end benchmark of 504 expert-curated question--answer pairs scored by an LLM judge whose ratings we validate against human judgments and against an independent-family judge. Applying these benchmarks under each regime, we find the open-versus-proprietary gap is small and cheaply closed by fine-tuning. Therefore, we train UTE-1, which is a state-of-the-art text embedder among open models for Uzbek. We also demonstrate that closing the performance gap via fine-tuning is both impractical due to the intensive hardware demands of long-context legal Q&A and unnecessary, given that legal acts change frequently. We support this by reporting a negative result from a QLoRA experiment. We distill practical guidance for similar deployments, drawn from a system serving real users in production. We release our benchmarks, evaluation code and the fine-tuned embedder (UTE-1) hrefhttps://metric-ai-lab.github.io/Uzbek-Legal-RAG/at this https URL to support future work on low-resource legal NLP.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.

Builds on

10 of 15 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  4. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  5. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  6. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  7. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
  8. 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Samplingcited by 1,006
  9. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
  10. 2025ASVRI-Legal: Fine-Tuning LLMs with Retrieval Augmented Generation for Enhanced Legal Regulationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark
  2. 2025Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agent for Trustworthy Legal Question Answering in Judicial Forensics
  3. 2026Fine-grained Claim-level RAG Benchmark for Law
  4. 2026Legal-DC: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Documents
  5. 2026Efficient LLM Distillation for Bangladesh Legal Context: A Smartphone-Compatible Retrieval-Augmented Generation Model
  6. 2026NepKANUN: A RAG-Based Nepali Legal Assistant
  7. 2026Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for the Nepali Legal Domain Question Answering
  8. 2025NitiBench: A Comprehensive Study of LLM Framework Capabilities for Thai Legal Question Answering