NFAD: Nuisance-Filtered Anomaly Detection Under Distribution Shift
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in anomaly detection (AD) for industrial inspection have pushed performance on standard benchmarks toward saturation. However, strong benchmark performance does not necessarily translate to real-world deployment, as these benchmarks are primarily collected under controlled acquisition conditions. Changes in illumination, background, viewpoint, and other environmental factors can shift normal samples away from the learned normal distribution and cause false anomaly responses. We address AD under such distribution shifts by explicitly modeling nuisance variation from changing imaging conditions in feature space. Without anomaly labels or target-domain data, our Nuisance-Filtered Anomaly Detection (NFAD) framework estimates a nuisance subspace from matched feature displacements induced by content-preserving perturbations and suppresses its contribution to anomaly residuals at inference. The same subspace supports two complementary branches: full projection for image-level detection and selective suppression for pixel-level localization, preserving evidence of localized defects. On AeBAD-S, a benchmark specifically designed for AD under acquisition shifts, NFAD achieves 91.0% image-level AUROC, establishing a new state of the art. Notably, this robustness does not come at the expense of conventional AD performance: NFAD remains competitive on standard benchmarks that do not explicitly evaluate distribution shift, including VisA, Real-IAD, and MVTec AD. These results show that explicitly suppressing such nuisance variation improves AD under distribution shift while preserving strong performance in standard settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.
Builds on
38 of 42 references.
References · 38
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
- 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 594
26 more
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
- 2022Anomaly Detection via Reverse Distillation from One-Class Embeddingcited by 421
- 2022SPot-the-Difference Self-Supervised Pre-training for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 400
- 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
- 2021CFLOW-AD: Real-Time Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Localization via Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 321
- 2023WinCLIP: Zero-/Few-Shot Anomaly Classification and Segmentationcited by 315
- 2022BEiT v2: Masked Image Modeling with Vector-Quantized Visual Tokenizerscited by 303
- 2020Sub-Image Anomaly Detection with Deep Pyramid Correspondencescited by 300
- 2023AnomalyCLIP: Object-agnostic Prompt Learning for Zero-shot Anomaly Detectioncited by 271
- 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 268
- 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
- 2023EfficientAD: Accurate Visual Anomaly Detection at Millisecond-Level Latenciescited by 160
- 2022DeSTSeg: Segmentation Guided Denoising Student-Teacher for Anomaly Detectioncited by 154
- 2021Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching for Anomaly Detectioncited by 146
- 2024Real-IAD: A Real-World Multi-View Dataset for Benchmarking Versatile Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 139
- 2022CFA: Coupled-hypersphere-based Feature Adaptation for Target-Oriented Anomaly Localizationcited by 135
- 2024MambaAD: Exploring State Space Models for Multi-class Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 113
- 2024Dinomaly: The Less Is More Philosophy in Multi-Class Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 93
- 2024DINOv2 Meets Text: A Unified Framework for Image- and Pixel-Level Vision-Language Alignmentcited by 79
- 2024A Unified Anomaly Synthesis Strategy with Gradient Ascent for Industrial Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 74
- 2023ReContrast: Domain-Specific Anomaly Detection via Contrastive Reconstructioncited by 63
- 2024AnomalyDINO: Boosting Patch-based Few-shot Anomaly Detection with DINOv2cited by 53
- 2023Industrial Anomaly Detection with Domain Shift: A Real-world Dataset and Masked Multi-scale Reconstructioncited by 23
- 2023MAST: Masked Augmentation Subspace Training for Generalizable Self-Supervised Priorscited by 8
- 2026Is Task-Specific Training Necessary for Anomaly Detection?cited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.