ActiveAugment: Online Active Learning for Augmentation Selection in Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data augmentation is a cornerstone of deep learning pipelines, yet existing strategies treat it as a static, model-agnostic preprocessing step, either relying on expensive dataset-specific policy search or applying transformations uniformly at random, regardless of what the model has already learned. We introduce ActiveAugment, a unified framework that treats augmentation selection as an online active learning problem. For each training minibatch, ActiveAugment generates a pool of candidate augmented views and scores each candidate using a combination of the model's predictive uncertainty and the feature discrepancy induced by the augmentation. The augmentation under which the current model is most fragile is selected per sample, and the model is then trained with a joint supervised classification and supervised contrastive objective that enforces intra-class invariance to the selected augmentations while maintaining inter-class separation. We evaluate ActiveAugment on eight benchmark datasets spanning natural and medical imaging, using CNN and transformer architectures across three training regimes (training from scratch, full fine-tuning, and linear probing), and comparing eight active selection strategies for augmentation scoring. ActiveAugment outperforms AutoAugment, RandAugment, and TrivialAugment under controlled augmentation shifts across all domains and budgets, with the most pronounced gains at low labelling budgets. On medical imaging datasets, where data is scarce and domain shift relative to natural-image pretrained models is large, ActiveAugment achieves higher test F1 than all baselines, demonstrating strong cross-domain adaptability. Our analysis reveals that the augmentation selection policy evolves meaningfully during training and that strategy choice has a direct impact on generalisation. Code is available at: https://github.com/noahvide/ActiveAugment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.
Builds on
20 of 38 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
- 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
- 2022TinyViT: Fast Pretraining Distillation for Small Vision Transformerscited by 234
8 more
- 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 227
- 2019BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wildcited by 225
- 2022Active Learning on a Budget: Opposite Strategies Suit High and Low Budgetscited by 133
- 2021AugMax: Adversarial Composition of Random Augmentations for Robust Trainingcited by 90
- 2021Self-Tuning for Data-Efficient Deep Learningcited by 39
- 2025BRISC: Annotated Dataset for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classificationcited by 15
- 2023Computation-efficient Deep Learning for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 14
- 2023BAL: Balancing Diversity and Novelty for Active Learningcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.