mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning-Theoretic Foundation for General Coded Computing: The Straggler Setting

arXiv 2608.28910 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Coded computing has emerged as a powerful paradigm for mitigating the impact of straggling workers in distributed computing systems. However, existing coded-computing schemes are predominantly designed for the exact recovery of highly structured computations, such as polynomial evaluation and matrix multiplication, and typically rely on strict recovery thresholds. These assumptions significantly limit their applicability to modern machine-learning workloads, particularly deep neural networks (DNNs), whose computations generally lack rigid algebraic structure and, in many applications, require only accurate approximations rather than exact recovery. To address this gap, we revisit coded computing from a learning-theoretic perspective and introduce General Coded Computing (GCC). Rather than adopting existing algebraic tools, GCC formulates coded computing through a natural end-to-end mean-squared error loss that directly measures the discrepancy between the desired computations and their recovered estimates. By deriving suitable upper bounds and restricting the encoder and decoder to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) with mild smoothness constraints, we show that both the encoder and decoder admit specific representations as linear combinations of RKHS kernel functions. This representation allows the corresponding coefficients to be computed efficiently. Moreover, this framework enables us to establish theoretical performance guarantees for GCC under two complementary straggler regimes. In the worst-case setting with N worker nodes, and at most S stragglers, we show that the end-to-end loss decays at least at rate O(S3N-3) for standard configurations. We then study a probabilistic setting in which each worker independently straggles with probability p. We prove that the expected loss can still converge at rate O(log1/p3(N)N-3).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 41 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Speeding Up Distributed Machine Learning Using Codescited by 76
  4. 2018Lagrange Coded Computing: Optimal Design for Resiliency, Security and Privacycited by 66
  5. 2017Polynomial Codes: an Optimal Design for High-Dimensional Coded Matrix Multiplicationcited by 32
  6. 2018On the Optimal Recovery Threshold of Coded Matrix Multiplicationcited by 27
  7. 2023Towards Optimal Sobolev Norm Rates for the Vector-Valued Regularized Least-Squares Algorithmcited by 22
  8. 2020A Scalable Approach for Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Machine Learningcited by 21
  9. 2019CodedPrivateML: A Fast and Privacy-Preserving Framework for Distributed Machine Learningcited by 20
  10. 2020Berrut Approximated Coded Computing: Straggler Resistance Beyond Polynomial Computingcited by 19
  11. 2018CodedSketch: A Coding Scheme for Distributed Computation of Approximated Matrix Multiplicationcited by 16
  12. 2020Analog Lagrange Coded Computingcited by 13
2 more
  1. 2018OverSketch: Approximate Matrix Multiplication for the Cloudcited by 10
  2. 2019OverSketched Newton: Fast Convex Optimization for Serverless Systemscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.