mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Open-Set Cattle Muzzle Identification: A Leakage-Controlled Benchmark and Evaluation Protocol

arXiv 2608.28663 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable individual cattle identification supports disease surveillance, vaccination records, breeding management, and livestock insurance. Although the bovine muzzle provides a stable, non-contact biometric, existing muzzle-recognition systems largely assume a closed set of enrolled animals, limiting their practical deployment. We reformulate cattle muzzle biometrics as an open-set, gallery-based identification problem that can reject previously unseen animals and support incremental enrollment without model retraining. We introduce a leakage-controlled evaluation protocol based on identity-disjoint splits, per-fold retraining, held-out threshold calibration, verified duplicate removal, and bootstrap confidence intervals. We evaluate the framework using two contrasting embedding configurations: a hybrid CNN-ViT metric-learning model and the MegaDescriptor-L foundation model. Under oracle threshold selection, the hybrid model achieves detection-and-identification rates of 98.3%, 96.4%, and 93.6% at target false-acceptance rates of 10^(-1), 10^(-2), and 10^(-3), respectively, while MegaDescriptor-L achieves 99.3%, 98.1%, and 96.1%. However, deployable threshold calibration reveals a substantial difference between oracle and calibrated performance: the hybrid model achieves a false-acceptance rate of 1.03% at a 1% target, whereas MegaDescriptor-L reaches 2.44%. Incremental enrollment further achieves Rank-1 accuracy above 91% with a single reference image and up to 97.3% with eight reference images, without retraining the model or degrading the existing gallery. These results demonstrate that threshold calibration, leakage control, and embedding quality are critical for reliable open-set cattle identification and provide a practical evaluation framework for deployment-oriented animal biometric systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 44 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  4. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  5. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  6. 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 538
  7. 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 499
  8. 2019Bag of Tricks and A Strong Baseline for Deep Person Re-identificationcited by 430
  9. 2022AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognitioncited by 391
  10. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 310
  11. 2018Reducing Network Agnostophobiacited by 165
  12. 2021Learning Placeholders for Open-Set Recognitioncited by 121
2 more
  1. 2023WildlifeDatasets: An open-source toolkit for animal re-identificationcited by 49
  2. 2025MHAFF: Multi-Head Attention Feature Fusion of CNN and Transformer for Cattle Identificationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.