mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning between the peaks: sharp asymptotics for kernel ridge regression under power-law anisotropy

arXiv 2608.28564 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study kernel ridge regression under anisotropic Gaussian data, where the input covariance decays as a power law with exponent α≥ 0 for polynomial inner-product kernels. We derive asymptotically sharp expressions for the kernel spectrum and the generalization error in the polynomial high-dimensional regime n=Theta(d^kappa), revealing how anisotropy reshapes the learning curves. For weak anisotropy (0<α<1), the problem remains effectively high-dimensional and retains some features of the isotropic case, while departing from it in others: the variance still peaks at integer sample complexities kappa∈mathbbN, but these peaks are progressively damped as α grows; meanwhile, for targets strongly aligned with the data's principal directions, the bias drops at fractional sample complexities, decoupling the bias transitions from the interpolation peaks. For strong anisotropy (α > 1), the effective dimension of the problem is constant, and the variance stops depending on sample size altogether, plateauing under ridgeless interpolation or vanishing at an explicit rate under fixed ridge penalty. The bias undergoes a sharp transition governed by the target's decay rate: below a threshold, learning is abrupt rather than gradual; above it, the bias decays as a power law that recovers the classical source and capacity rates. We finally specialize these results to single-index targets, showing how the alignment of the index with the data's principal directions determines the effect of anisotropy on learning. Together, our results clarify how the input geometry shapes the kernel features and fundamentally impacts its generalization properties.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

Builds on

7 of 57 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 116
  3. 2022Spectrum of inner-product kernel matrices in the polynomial regime and multiple descent phenomenon in kernel ridge regressioncited by 45
  4. 2024A non-asymptotic theory of Kernel Ridge Regression: deterministic equivalents, test error, and GCV estimatorcited by 28
  5. 2026Deriving Neural Scaling Laws from the statistics of natural languagecited by 23
  6. 2025Kernel ridge regression under power-law data: spectrum and generalizationcited by 10
  7. 2026Power-Law Spectrum of the Random Feature Modelcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.