mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BEACON: Behavior-Anchored Cross-Source Knowledge Graph Construction for Cyber Threat Intelligence

arXiv 2608.28394 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2026cs.CR cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) is foundational to modern cyber defense, yet much of it resides in unstructured reports whose volume and heterogeneity far exceed manual analysis, motivating research on automatically constructing knowledge graphs from CTI reports. However, existing approaches mainly extract partial information within a single report, leaving the cross-source setting unexplored, where the same threat is given unrelated names. Our key insight is that attack behaviors, once mapped to MITRE ATT&CK (a standardized catalog of attack techniques), can anchor the rest of a report. Attack behaviors are the adversarial actions a report describes, while contextual entities (e.g., threat actors, campaigns, and affected products) and Indicators of Compromise (IoCs; e.g., IP addresses) are their participants and traces. Attaching them to these anchors places every per-report graph in one canonical space. We realize this insight in BEACON, an LLM-driven framework for cross-source CTI knowledge graph construction. Its first stage extracts each report into a graph under a propose-then-verify paradigm, grounding candidates in report evidence and official ATT&CK definitions, to suppress LLM misclassification and hallucination. Its second stage merges these graphs with a hierarchical alignment strategy that applies signals in decreasing order of determinism, from character-level and semantic similarity to overlapping technique neighborhoods, iterating as merges pool neighborhoods. No existing benchmark links entities to technique anchors or provides cross-source alignment ground truth. We therefore construct and release two human-annotated datasets from 34 sources: to our knowledge the largest for report-level CTI extraction (8,395 elements) and the first for cross-source consolidation (3,487). On them, BEACON outperforms all baselines by at least 23% and 9%, respectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 50 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2020Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 144
  4. 2024Extract, Define, Canonicalize: An LLM-based Framework for Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 70
  5. 2024Match, Compare, or Select? An Investigation of Large Language Models for Entity Matchingcited by 32
  6. 2021AttacKG: Constructing Technique Knowledge Graph from Cyber Threat Intelligence Reportscited by 31
  7. 2022Looking Beyond IoCs: Automatically Extracting Attack Patterns from External CTIcited by 27
  8. 2020Automated Retrieval of ATT&CK Tactics and Techniques for Cyber Threat Reportscited by 17
  9. 2024Unlocking the Power of Large Language Models for Entity Alignmentcited by 15
  10. 2023STIXnet: A Novel and Modular Solution for Extracting All STIX Objects in CTI Reportscited by 10
  11. 2022ThreatKG: An AI-Powered System for Automated Open-Source Cyber Threat Intelligence Gathering and Managementcited by 9
  12. 2021Cyber Threat Intelligence Model: An Evaluation of Taxonomies, Sharing Standards, and Ontologies within Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 8
5 more
  1. 2024CRUcialG: Reconstruct Integrated Attack Scenario Graphs by Cyber Threat Intelligence Reportscited by 5
  2. 2025Large Language Models Are Unreliable for Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 5
  3. 2024Noise Contrastive Estimation-based Matching Framework for Low-Resource Security Attack Pattern Recognitioncited by 4
  4. 2024Semantic Ranking for Automated Adversarial Technique Annotation in Security Textcited by 4
  5. 2026The CTI Echo Chamber: Fragmentation, Overlap, and Vendor Specificity in Twenty Years of Cyber Threat Reportingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.