What Makes Agent Memory Useful for Reliable Unanswerable Question Handling?
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable handling of unanswerable questions (UAQs) is critical for trustworthy LLM-based agents. Although memory is widely used in agent systems, its role in reliable UAQ handling remains unclear. We present a systematic study of agent memory for UAQ handling under a unified agentic RAG framework, evaluating four representative memory methods across three UAQ-related datasets and two base models. We find that memory can improve UAQ performance in some settings, but such gains are selective rather than universal and remain fragile under dataset shift. Interestingly, cross-model memory reuse is often more feasible than cross-dataset transfer, suggesting that shifts in answerability patterns pose a greater challenge to memory reuse than changes in the base model itself. We further find that UAQ gains are more strongly preserved through decision guidance than through trajectory shaping, and that memory effectiveness depends strongly on representation. In particular, procedural and rule-based memories often provide the most reliable support for UAQ handling, while memory composition is most effective when procedural guidance is combined with complementary behavioral signals. Overall, our findings suggest that reliable UAQ memory depends less on storing larger amounts of experience and more on preserving transferable behavioral guidance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.
Builds on
15 of 24 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms7 May
- 2026When Continual Learning Moves to Memory: A Study of Experience Reuse in LLM Agents29 Apr
- 2025MemEvolve: Meta-Evolution of Agent Memory Systems21 Dec
- 2024On the Structural Memory of LLM Agents17 Dec
- 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents21 Apr
Other references · 10
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 876
- 2023Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 243
- 2023Knowledge of Knowledge: Exploring Known-Unknowns Uncertainty with Large Language Modelscited by 61
- 2023Won't Get Fooled Again: Answering Questions with False Premisescited by 48
- 2024Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 44
- 2023Examining LLMs' Uncertainty Expression Towards Questions Outside Parametric Knowledgecited by 32
- 2025GRAIT: Gradient-Driven Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning for Effective Hallucination Mitigationcited by 11
- 2024When to Speak, When to Abstain: Contrastive Decoding with Abstentioncited by 8
- 2025UAQFact: Evaluating Factual Knowledge Utilization of LLMs on Unanswerable Questionscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Harness the Memory: A Holistic Evaluation of Memory Substrates in Memory Agents
- 2025Hindsight is 20/20: Building Agent Memory that Retains, Recalls, and Reflects
- 2026Can Agents Forget When Asked? A Benchmark for Memory Unlearning in LLM Agents
- 2026MemoryCPT: An End-to-End Agent Memory Framework for Cost-Performance Trade-off
- 2026Memory as an Attack Surface in LLM Agents: A Study on Multiple-Choice Question Answering
- 2026AMA: Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration
- 2026Ground Truth First: A Longitudinal Evaluation Instrument for Agent Memory, and the Tenure Crossover in Memory-Architecture Rankings
- 2026MINTEval: Evaluating Memory under Multi-Target Interference in Long-Horizon Agent Systems