mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PersonaEdit: Representative Sample Selection for Personalized Model Editing

arXiv 2608.27816 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Personalization has attracted growing interest in LLM applications, yet existing retrieval-based approaches depend heavily on retrieval quality and degrade in long-term interactions. Model editing, which directly modifies internal model parameters to incorporate new knowledge, has demonstrated effective knowledge modification capabilities in factual knowledge editing tasks and may provide a potential solution for personalization. However, scaling model editing to personalization is non-trivial. Editing large amounts of user data increases computational cost and causes interference among edits, motivating the need for effective sample selection. To address this issue, we propose, PersonaEdit, a hidden representation clustering strategy that selects representative editing samples through proportional stratified sampling. Experiments show that model editing is effective for personalization, and that our selection strategy preserves most of the performance while substantially reducing the number of required editing samples. Beyond standalone editing, we find that combining model editing with retrieval-based prompt augmentation further improves personalization, as edited knowledge and retrieved context provide complementary information. These results demonstrate the potential of model editing as an efficient and scalable approach for LLM personalization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  4. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  5. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  6. 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
  7. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  8. 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
  9. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
  10. 2021Fast Model Editing at Scalecited by 498
  11. 2024Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 93
  12. 2025Measuring What Makes You Unique: Difference-Aware User Modeling for Enhancing LLM Personalizationcited by 45
9 more
  1. 2024Few-shot Personalization of LLMs with Mis-aligned Responsescited by 32
  2. 2024LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMscited by 32
  3. 2024User Embedding Model for Personalized Language Promptingcited by 28
  4. 2025Latent Inter-User Difference Modeling for LLM Personalizationcited by 21
  5. 2025Personalize Your LLM: Fake it then Align itcited by 15
  6. 2025Personalize Before Retrieve: LLM-based Personalized Query Expansion for User-Centric Retrievalcited by 11
  7. 2020An Effectiveness Metric for Ordinal Classification: Formal Properties and Experimental Resultscited by 7
  8. 2025MEMIT-Merge: Addressing MEMIT's Key-Value Conflicts in Same-Subject Batch Editing for LLMscited by 6
  9. 2025Towards Effective Model Editing for LLM Personalizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.