mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Informational Antilocality and the Locality Bias in LLMs

arXiv 2608.27760 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the ability of transformer-based language models (LLMs) to learn what we call k-antilocal languages, i.e., languages that have no mutual information across any span of k contiguous symbols. We construct such languages with increasing k, finding that LLMs trained on them achieve comparable cross-entropy loss regardless of antilocality, but converge more slowly on more antilocal languages. Our findings support the idea that non-local dependencies are more difficult to learn, but the evidence for this bias comes from learning speed rather than learning success.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

Builds on

10 of 26 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  4. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
  5. 2025How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Modelscited by 51
  6. 2025Can Language Models Learn Typologically Implausible Languages?cited by 23
  7. 2025Anything Goes? A Crosslinguistic Study of (Im)possible Language Learning in LMscited by 20
  8. 2025Information Locality as an Inductive Bias for Neural Language Modelscited by 14
  9. 2025Biasless Language Models Learn Unnaturally: How LLMs Fail to Distinguish the Possible from the Impossiblecited by 3
  10. 2025Studies with impossible languages falsify LMs as models of human languagecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.