Destroy Me: Automatic Artifact Generation for Histopathology Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning's diagnostic utility in pathology is constrained by model vulnerability to real-world data imperfections. While current strategies favor "perfect data" by filtering low-quality regions, which can lead to the loss of valuable diagnostic context, we propose a paradigm shift: engineering models to thrive in imperfect environments using "Destroy Me", a hybrid framework for realistic artifact synthesis and robust data augmentation. Our approach combines Stable Diffusion, fine-tuned to preserve morphological continuity by realistically integrating artifacts with the underlying tissue architecture, with physics-based procedural modeling to synthesize six common artifact types: tissue folds, precipitates, blur, stitching errors, dust, and pen markers. Artifact fidelity is assessed using Kernel Inception Distance (KID) and color Wasserstein distance metrics. Validating this strategy on lung adenocarcinoma pattern classification with an nnU-Net, we confirm that models trained on "destroyed" patches consistently outperform baselines on independent real-world datasets. Specifically, we observed a 10.5% relative improvement in macro F1-score and a 15% relative increase in the Cohen's Kappa (kappa) coefficient. Crucially, our results demonstrate that selective, impact-weighted augmentation is vital for balancing practical robustness with the preservation of subtle diagnostic features.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
11 of 27 references.
References · 11
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 240
- 2023Artificial Intelligence for Digital and Computational Pathologycited by 108
- 2019Pathologist-level classification of histologic patterns on resected lung adenocarcinoma slides with deep neural networkscited by 43
- 2015Computational Pathology: Challenges and Promises for Tissue Analysiscited by 20
- 2025Metrics that matter: Evaluating image quality metrics for medical image generationcited by 12
- 2024Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offscited by 11
- 2025PathDiff: Histopathology Image Synthesis with Unpaired Text and Mask Conditionscited by 9
- 2024Improving Quality Control of Whole Slide Images by Explicit Artifact Augmentationcited by 2
- 2024Semantic Segmentation Based Quality Control of Histopathology Whole Slide Imagescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024LatentArtiFusion: An Effective and Efficient Histological Artifacts Restoration Framework
- 2026DiffusionQC: Artifact Detection in Histopathology via Diffusion Model
- 2023Latent Diffusion Models with Image-Derived Annotations for Enhanced AI-Assisted Cancer Diagnosis in Histopathology
- 2026A Generative Foundation Model for Multimodal Histopathology
- 2025Investigating Zero-Shot Diagnostic Pathology in Vision-Language Models with Efficient Prompt Design
- 2026Controllable Diffusion-Based Lesion Inpainting for Scalable Histopathology Data Augmentation
- 2026Assessment of Conditional Diffusion Model for Synthetic Histopathology Image Generation
- 2024Unleashing the Potential of Synthetic Images: A Study on Histopathology Image Classification