Simultaneous Envy and Equitability Guarantees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work in fair division has focused on either simultaneously satisfying closely related fairness notions or achieving a single notion across the ex-ante and ex-post worlds. We study the compatibility of two fundamentally different fairness notions: envy-freeness and equitability. For indivisible goods-only and chores-only settings, we study the existence and complexity of simultaneously satisfying their relaxations, revealing sharp contrasts between the two settings. For normalized binary goods, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for computing an EF1+EQ1 allocation with at most seven agents, but also construct a normalized instance with a larger number of agents for which no such allocation exists. In sharp contrast, binary chores admit the stronger EFX+EQX guarantee for any number of agents, even without normalization. We further initiate the study of cross-notion ex-ante and ex-post guarantees, asking whether randomized allocations can provide ex-ante guarantees for one notion while preserving ex-post guarantees for another.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.
Builds on
31 of 47 references.
References · 31
- 2017Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuationscited by 22
- 2022Fair Division of Indivisible Goods: Recent Progress and Open Questionscited by 21
- 2020Best of Both Worlds: Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Fairness in Resource Allocationcited by 15
- 2020EFX Exists for Three Agentscited by 14
- 2020Maximum Nash Welfare and Other Stories About EFXcited by 13
- 2020Fair and Truthful Mechanisms for Dichotomous Valuationscited by 13
- 2020Fair Division with Binary Valuations: One Rule to Rule Them Allcited by 11
- 2019Almost Envy-Freeness in Group Resource Allocationcited by 9
- 2019Equitable Allocations of Indivisible Goodscited by 9
- 2021Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair-Share Allocationscited by 8
- 2020Fair and Efficient Online Allocations with Normalized Valuationscited by 7
- 2018Greedy Algorithms for Maximizing Nash Social Welfarecited by 5
19 more
- 2022A General Framework for Fair Allocation under Matroid Rank Valuationscited by 4
- 2023Weighted Fair Division with Matroid-Rank Valuations: Monotonicity and Strategyproofnesscited by 4
- 2023Breaking the Envy Cycle: Best-of-Both-Worlds Guarantees for Subadditive Valuationscited by 3
- 2023EFX Allocations Exist for Binary Valuationscited by 3
- 2023The Fairness Fair: Bringing Human Perception into Collective Decision-Makingcited by 2
- 2024Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair Allocation of Indivisible and Mixed Goodscited by 2
- 2025Exploring Relations among Fairness Notions in Discrete Fair Divisioncited by 2
- 2025Existence of Fair and Efficient Allocation of Indivisible Chorescited by 2
- 2025On Pareto-Optimal and Fair Allocations with Personalized Bi-Valued Utilitiescited by 2
- 2020Equitable Allocations of Indivisible Chorescited by 1
- 2023On the Existence of EFX (and Pareto-Optimal) Allocations for Binary Chorescited by 1
- 2024Randomized Strategyproof Mechanisms with Best of Both Worlds Fairness and Efficiencycited by 1
- 2024Achieving Maximin Share and EFX/EF1 Guarantees Simultaneouslycited by 1
- 2025Best of Both Worlds Guarantees for Equitable Allocationscited by 1
- 2025Achieving Equitability with Subsidycited by 1
- 2025Centralized Group Equitability and Individual Envy-Freeness in the Allocation of Indivisible Itemscited by 1
- 2026Simultaneous Ordinal Maximin Share and Envy-Based Guaranteescited by 1
- 2026Counterexamples to EFX for Submodular and Subadditive Valuationscited by 1
- 2026EFX for Additive Chores: Nonexistence, Pareto Incompatibility, and Bi-Valued Existencecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.