ProofEvolve: Neuro-Symbolic Evolution for Formal Automated Theorem Proving
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated theorem proving offers a natural foundation for recursive self-improvement in scientific discovery. However, existing neural provers do not fully preserve this recursive structure, where the learning process should be self-improving over time. Existing methods either embed proof experience into model parameters through expensive weight updates, or keep verified intermediate deductions only within the current problem. In addition, these methods also heavily rely on sparse whole-proof feedback, even when unsuccessful partial attempts contain useful discoveries. To close the gap, we propose ProofEvolve, a neuro-symbolic framework that evolves explicit, formally verified symbolic proof structures with neural models to decisively expand the knowledge boundary. In this framework, the neural model proposes variation operators, including decompositions, repairs, and schema recombinations. The symbolic Lean kernel verifies every proof transition. Over the evolution loops, ProofEvolve computes verified closure over the resulting proof directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). Within each problem, ProofEvolve evolves partial AND-OR proof DAGs in a behaviorally indexed archive. Across problems, kernel-checked schema extraction adds newly proved sub-DAGs to a persistent schema library. Proof DAGs inherit the solved results through typed schema recombination, with every residual premise exposed as a new subgoal. This evolutionary process preserves verified results from incomplete attempts and makes them available for later proofs without weakening formal soundness. Across three competition-level Lean benchmarks, ProofEvolve achieves the highest average solve rate among the evaluated proof systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.
Builds on
23 of 45 references.
References · 23
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 406
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
- 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 294
- 2022Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofscited by 278
- 2022HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Provingcited by 192
- 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 153
- 2025Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correctioncited by 140
- 2021Proof Artifact Co-training for Theorem Proving with Language Modelscited by 130
- 2024Lean Workbook: A large-scale Lean problem set formalized from natural language math problemscited by 115
- 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Provingcited by 82
11 more
- 2023An In-Context Learning Agent for Formal Theorem-Provingcited by 78
- 2025Towards Robust Mathematical Reasoningcited by 67
- 2025Hilbert: Recursively Building Formal Proofs with Informal Reasoningcited by 55
- 2024Learning Formal Mathematics From Intrinsic Motivationcited by 45
- 2025Ax-Prover: A Deep Reasoning Agentic Framework for Theorem Proving in Mathematics and Quantum Physicscited by 27
- 2025Leanabell-Prover-V2: Verifier-integrated Reasoning for Formal Theorem Proving via Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2025Scaling up Multi-Turn Off-Policy RL and Multi-Agent Tree Search for LLM Step-Proverscited by 26
- 2019Towards Evolutionary Theorem Proving for Isabelle/HOLcited by 4
- 2026DreamProver: Evolving Transferable Lemma Libraries via a Wake-Sleep Theorem-Proving Agentcited by 4
- 2025LLM Library Learning Fails: A LEGO-Prover Case Studycited by 3
- 2025Proof Strategy Extraction from LLMs for Enhancing Symbolic Proverscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.