Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Customer Churn Prediction in Telecommunications: A Framework for CRM Integration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Subscriber attrition is a costly, persistent challenge for telecommunications providers, with monthly churn of roughly 1.9% in mature markets eroding billions in revenue annually. Predictive models can flag at-risk customers accurately, yet they are routinely excluded from frontline CRM workflows because high-performing ensemble and non-linear architectures are opaque: a retention specialist cannot design a personalised intervention from a probability score alone, without knowing why a subscriber is at risk. This paper addresses that gap. We benchmark four classifiers--Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM--on the IBM Telco Customer Churn benchmark (7,043 records; 19 features; 26.5% churn, balanced to 50% via SMOTE on the training partition only). Logistic Regression attains the strongest AUC-ROC (0.8411) and LightGBM the highest accuracy (78.42%); all four fall within a 0.011 AUC band (0.831--0.841), and 5-fold cross-validation confirms the leading models are effectively tied. Explanations are delivered at two granularities: a global SHAP ranking identifying tenure, total charges, and month-to-month contract as the dominant churn signals, and instance-level SHAP and LIME decompositions that expose the drivers behind each prediction. Building on these outputs, we introduce a four-layer CRM integration architecture that converts risk scores and attribution vectors into tiered segmentation, maps top features to structured retention-action templates, and routes campaign outcomes into a retraining feedback loop. Targeting the highest-risk quintile is projected to cut overall churn by 3.3--5.3 percentage points, preserving an estimated 199K--319K per campaign cycle.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
7 of 30 references.
References · 7
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
Built on by
Not cited yet.