mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Accuracy-Efficiency Paradox Quantifying Net Energy Loss in on-Device Energy Forecasting

arXiv 2608.26134 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Energy forecasting aims to maximize accuracy to ensure energy efficiency by reducing energy waste, an objective that applies equally to on-device forecasting for mission-critical edge environments, including military systems. However, this paper identifies the Accuracy-Efficiency Paradox: high-precision energy forecasting models can ironically trigger a net energy deficit. This stems from both edge AI's inference energy consumption and battery aging. We propose a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) framework for energy forecasting, designed to minimize net energy loss. This framework treats not only inference energy consumption but also battery aging as a unified form of energy loss, as degradation represents a physical dissipation of the system's future energy-carrying capacity. We demonstrate that in thermally sensitive edge environments, energy saved by the superior precision of complex architectures is often outweighed by the total energy lost through their high operational intensity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

3 of 8 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Modelscited by 169
  2. 2023Unveiling Energy Efficiency in Deep Learning: Measurement, Prediction, and Scoring across Edge Devicescited by 17
  3. 2023FedZero: Leveraging Renewable Excess Energy in Federated Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.