mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Regularization for Random Features: A Neighboring Early-Stopping Rule with Oracle-Rate Guarantees

arXiv 2608.25513 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Random feature methods provide a scalable approximation to kernel ridge regression (KRR), but the regularization parameter that yields the oracle learning rate depends on unknown smoothness and capacity parameters. In this work, we propose a neighboring early-stopping rule for adaptive regularization in KRR with random features (KRR-RF). The method uses a grid that is uniform in inverse regularization and compares only adjacent estimators, reducing the number of discrepancy comparisons relative to standard all-pairs Lepskii-type procedures. Both the neighboring discrepancy and its empirical complexity term can be computed directly in the random feature space, without constructing the exact kernel Gram matrix. We establish a high-probability comparison bound for neighboring KRR-RF estimators and show that, under standard source and capacity conditions together with suitable grid and random feature budget conditions, the selected estimator attains the oracle polynomial learning rate up to logarithmic factors. The result allows the regularization parameter to be selected without prior knowledge of the source and capacity exponents and covers both well-specified and partially misspecified regimes. Our analysis is based on an empirical random feature effective dimension that connects the observable stopping threshold with the population complexity of the random feature model. Simulation and real-data experiments illustrate the prediction performance and computational behavior of the proposed method in comparison with standard tuning procedures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 57 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 163
  2. 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 136
  3. 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 86
  4. 2017FALKON: An Optimal Large Scale Kernel Methodcited by 82
  5. 2016Optimal Rates For Regularization Of Statistical Inverse Learning Problemscited by 68
  6. 2013Divide and Conquer Kernel Ridge Regression: A Distributed Algorithm with Minimax Optimal Ratescited by 64
  7. 2018Optimal Rates for Spectral Algorithms with Least-Squares Regression over Hilbert Spacescited by 59
  8. 2016Faster Kernel Ridge Regression Using Sketching and Preconditioningcited by 43
  9. 2016Distributed learning with regularized least squarescited by 42
  10. 2017Early stopping for kernel boosting algorithms: A general analysis with localized complexitiescited by 27
  11. 2018Optimal Convergence for Distributed Learning with Stochastic Gradient Methods and Spectral Algorithmscited by 22
  12. 2020Analyzing the discrepancy principle for kernelized spectral filter learning algorithmscited by 15
8 more
  1. 2020Distributed Kernel Ridge Regression with Communicationscited by 14
  2. 2016Optimal Rates for Multi-pass Stochastic Gradient Methodscited by 8
  3. 2024Optimal Kernel Quantile Learning with Random Featurescited by 4
  4. 2023Adaptive Parameter Selection for Kernel Ridge Regressioncited by 3
  5. 2023Adaptive Distributed Kernel Ridge Regression: A Feasible Distributed Learning Scheme for Data Siloscited by 2
  6. 2024Lepskii Principle for Distributed Kernel Ridge Regressioncited by 1
  7. 2025On the Generalization Properties of Learning the Random Feature Models with Learnable Activation Functionscited by 1
  8. 2026Beyond Cross-Validation: Adaptive Parameter Selection for Kernel-Based Gradient Descentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.