mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Parameterized Complexity of Lp-Lipschitz Constants for Input Convex Neural Networks and Lp-Norm Maximization over Zonotopes

arXiv 2608.24865 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2026cs.CC cs.DM cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Lipschitz constants are a standard way to quantify the sensitivity of neural networks to small input perturbations, but computing them is difficult even for shallow ReLU networks. We study this problem for two-layer input-convex neural networks (ICNNs), a restricted architecture where nonnegative output weights enforce convexity. Computing the Lp-Lipschitz constant for these networks is equivalent to maximizing the dual norm over a zonotope. While L1- and L_∞-norm maximization on zonotopes admit fixed-parameter and polynomial-time algorithms, respectively, the parameterized complexity of the remaining Lp-norms was open. We prove that, for every fixed p∈ (1,∞)cap mathbbQ, maximizing the Lp-norm over a zonotope in ℝd is W[1]-hard with respect to the dimension d. Moreover, our hardness results imply that brute-force enumeration algorithms are essentially optimal for this problem under the Exponential Time Hypothesis. By duality, the same hardness results hold for computing the Lp-Lipschitz constant of two-layer ReLU ICNNs. Our proof first establishes the result for the L2-norm and then transfers the construction to arbitrary fixed p∈ (1,∞)capmathbbQ using a suitable Taylor approximation. These results resolve the corresponding questions regarding the parameterized complexity status for zonotope norm maximization and two-layer ICNN Lipschitz constants. Our paper resolves an open problem posted at COLT'25. There are several independent concurrent papers resolving the same problem. Our paper prioritizes a clear exposition of the underlying mathematics and conceptual intuitions behind the proof. Additionally, we explicitly describe our research process including the use of LLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.

Builds on

19 of 40 references.

References · 19

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  2. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  3. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  4. 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 415
  5. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
  6. 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 293
  7. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  8. 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 257
  9. 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 255
  10. 2019Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networkscited by 206
  11. 2020Exactly Computing the Local Lipschitz Constant of ReLU Networkscited by 102
  12. 2018Tropical Geometry of Deep Neural Networkscited by 95
7 more
  1. 2020Convex Potential Flows: Universal Probability Distributions with Optimal Transport and Convex Optimizationcited by 90
  2. 2018Optimal Control Via Neural Networks: A Convex Approachcited by 85
  3. 2023Training Neural Networks is NP-Hard in Fixed Dimensioncited by 23
  4. 2021The Computational Complexity of ReLU Network Training Parameterized by Data Dimensionalitycited by 22
  5. 2013Fixed Parameter Complexity and Approximability of Norm Maximizationcited by 2
  6. 2026New Complexity-Theoretic Frontiers of Tractability for Neural Network Trainingcited by 2
  7. 2026ℓp-Norm Maximization over Zonotopes Is W[1]-Hardcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.