Implicit Q-learning-bootstrapped ant colony optimization for maritime moving-target observation scheduling with agile satellites
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Maritime moving-target observation scheduling with agile Earth observation satellites is a dynamic, sequence-dependent combinatorial optimization problem. Sea-surface targets move continuously, causing feasible observation windows to vary with target motion and satellite orbital geometry. The scheduler must jointly determine task selection, satellite assignment, observation-window selection, and observation ordering under time-window, attitude-maneuvering, and onboard-resource constraints. This paper proposes an implicit Q-learning-bootstrapped ant colony optimization method, termed IQACO, for multi-satellite maritime moving-target observation scheduling. Rather than directly learning a task-selection policy, IQACO embeds an offline implicit Q-learning module into constructive ant colony optimization to adaptively adjust the pheromone factor, heuristic factor, and evaporation rate. A compact search-state representation captures pheromone distribution, current and historical-best solution quality, and iteration progress. During online scheduling, ant colony optimization constructs feasible observation sequences, while the learned policy adjusts the search behavior according to the current search state. Experiments on 14 scenarios with different scales and satellite configurations show that IQACO consistently outperforms the compared algorithms, improving the mean objective value over conventional ant colony optimization by 2.86%-9.41%. Further comparative and supplementary experiments demonstrate its effectiveness and robustness across different scheduling conditions and problem settings. These results indicate that offline value learning provides an effective adaptive search-control mechanism for constrained maritime moving-target observation scheduling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.
Builds on
6 of 34 references.
References · 6
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
- 2022A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problemscited by 231
- 2020Agile Earth observation satellite scheduling over 20 years: formulations, methods and future directionscited by 20
- 2022RL-GA: A Reinforcement Learning-Based Genetic Algorithm for Electromagnetic Detection Satellite Scheduling Problemcited by 8
- 2025An energy-efficient learning solution for the Agile Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling Problemcited by 2
- 2026An effective Genetic Programming Hyper-Heuristic for Uncertain Agile Satellite Schedulingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Reinforcement Learning-Guided Evolutionary Policy Optimization for Preference-Adjustable Heterogeneous Agile Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling
- 2026EOS-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling ↗
- 2025Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Heterogeneous Satellite Cluster Resources Optimization
- 2025Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Multi-Satellite Earth Observation: A Realistic Case Study
- 2026On-Orbit Space AI: Federated, Multi-Agent, and Collaborative Algorithms for Satellite Constellations
- 2025On the Role of AI in Managing Satellite Constellations: Insights from the ConstellAI Project
- 2024Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling with Graph Neural Networks and Monte Carlo Tree Search
- 2025Microservice Deployment in Space Computing Power Networks via Robust Reinforcement Learning