Selective Regenerative Decoding: Trajectory-Level Intervention for Inference-Time Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Inference-time decoding methods improve LLM reasoning by exploring multiple candidate trajectories, yet treat each trajectory as atomic: either retaining it whole or discarding it irreversibly. This wastes computation on partially promising candidates whose high-quality prefixes are abandoned alongside degraded suffixes. We introduce Selective Regenerative Decoding (SRD), which routes each candidate to discard, keep, or refine only the degraded portion of the suffix while preserving the useful prefix of borderline candidates, without requiring a larger target model. Under mild assumptions, SRD achieves a provable 1.28-to-1.36-fold gain in sample efficiency over rejection sampling with strictly higher expected trajectory quality, with the gain growing as the candidate pool grows. Across MATH500, GPQA Diamond, HotpotQA, and AlpacaEval with multiple generation-reward model pairs, SRD matches Best-of-N accuracy with substantially fewer generated tokens and outperforms speculative rejection in low-compute regimes. By enabling segment-level intervention rather than whole-trajectory selection, SRD opens a previously underexplored region of the accuracy-compute tradeoff for inference-time reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.
Builds on
7 of 30 references.
References · 7
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,745
- 2023Efficient Guided Generation for Large Language Modelscited by 200
- 2023It's MBR All the Way Down: Modern Generation Techniques Through the Lens of Minimum Bayes Riskcited by 51
- 2023Faithfulness-Aware Decoding Strategies for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 31
- 2023Measuring and Mitigating Constraint Violations of In-Context Learning for Utterance-to-API Semantic Parsingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A*-Decoding: Token-Efficient Inference Scaling
- 2026Trajectory-Retrieval Speculative Decoding: When Does a Model's Own History Help?
- 2025Unleashing the True Potential of LLMs: A Feedback-Triggered Self-Correction with Long-Term Multipath Decoding
- 2026Prism: Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Hierarchical Search and Self-Verification for Discrete Diffusion Language Models
- 2026A rigor-matched audit of periodic-step layer skipping for efficient llm inference: conflayers versus swift, with a supplemental analysis of trained routing alternatives
- 2026Martingale Foresight Sampling: A Principled Approach to Inference-Time LLM Decoding
- 2025R-Stitch: Dynamic Trajectory Stitching for Efficient Reasoning
- 2025Scaling Up, Speeding Up: A Benchmark of Speculative Decoding for Efficient LLM Test-Time Scaling