mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Continual Visual Learning under Evolving Semantic Concept Shift

arXiv 2608.23903 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual foundation models are commonly adapted under the assumption that the appearance of incoming data may change while the semantic meaning of the prediction task remains fixed. In long-lived visual systems, however, taxonomies, policies, and concept definitions can themselves evolve, causing the same visual evidence to require a different interpretation. We study this setting as evolving semantic concept shift and introduce SemReWrite, a framework for selectively updating obsolete visual--semantic mappings while preserving knowledge that remains valid. SemReWrite represents changes between old and revised semantic specifications, combines semantic discrepancy with sparse revised supervision to localize affected visual regions, and uses an input-dependent low-rank rewriting mechanism together with structured semantic memory, preservation, and obsolete-decision suppression. We further introduce EvoShift-Bench, spanning ImageNet, iNaturalist, CUB-200-2011, and DomainNet, with semantic transitions including class split, merge, boundary revision, insertion, partial redefinition, recurrence, and mixed semantic--appearance shift. To explicitly evaluate selective semantic revision, we introduce Rewrite Accuracy (RA) and Preservation Accuracy (PA) for affected and unaffected regions, respectively, Obsolete Retention (OR) for measuring residual outdated semantic associations, and the Selective Revision Score (SRS), which jointly summarizes rewriting and preservation performance. Experiments show that SemReWrite achieves a stronger balance between learning revised semantics and retaining unaffected knowledge than prompt replacement, conventional fine-tuning, parameter-efficient adaptation, and continual-learning strategies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

27 of 51 references.

References · 27

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  4. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  5. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  7. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  8. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  9. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
  10. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
  11. 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 895
  12. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 860
15 more
  1. 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 834
  2. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 379
  3. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  4. 2023Class-Incremental Learning: A Surveycited by 209
  5. 2023Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 189
  6. 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 138
  7. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 104
  8. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 100
  9. 2023Learning without Forgetting for Vision-Language Modelscited by 79
  10. 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 43
  11. 2024Few-shot Adaptation of Multi-modal Foundation Models: A Surveycited by 28
  12. 2025Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 14
  13. 2024Learning Visual Conditioning Tokens to Correct Domain Shift for Fully Test-time Adaptationcited by 7
  14. 2022Semantic-aware Message Broadcasting for Efficient Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 2
  15. 2025COLA: Context-aware Language-driven Test-time Adaptationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.