Discovering Cross-Language Reasoning Invariance in LLMs with Geometry-Invariant Sparse Autoencoders
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Multilingual language models can solve the same mathematical problem in different languages, but it remains unclear whether they rely on shared features or on language-specific computations that only produce similar outputs. We study this question in five models from four families using the Multilingual Grade School Math (MGSM) dataset, with problems solved in English, German, French, Spanish, Russian, and Chinese, retaining problems with valid reasoning traces in all six languages and replaying those traces through the model to record representations at multiple layers. For each model, we first use Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) to identify layers with cross-language alignment. At each selected layer, we train two sparse autoencoders (SAE): a baseline reconstruction-only model and a contrastive variant introduced in this work, the Geometry-Invariant SAE (GI-SAE). GI-SAE supplements the reconstruction loss with an Information Noise-Contrastive Estimation (InfoNCE) loss that trains the encoder to produce similar activations for traces of the same problem, regardless of language or token position. We then test whether the resulting shared features are functionally interchangeable by swapping their values between languages during the model's forward pass and measuring the resulting change in output, quantified by Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence per feature. Although GI-SAE yields higher CKA and Jaccard similarity at nearly every layer, higher geometric similarity does not consistently imply greater functional interchangeability. We find that cross-language feature sharing is model- and architecture-dependent in this sample and appears at different depths in different models. GI-SAE primarily amplifies cross-language structure already present: the pattern is model-specific, with strengthening in Qwen, no functional benefit in Gemma, and mixed layer-dependent effects in Llama and Phi.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.
Builds on
21 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
- 2024Large Language Models Are Cross-Lingual Knowledge-Free Reasoners24 Jun
Other references · 19
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 700
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 518
- 2024Do Llamas Work in English? On the Latent Language of Multilingual Transformerscited by 275
7 more
- 2024Language-Specific Neurons: The Key to Multilingual Capabilities in Large Language Modelscited by 124
- 2024On the Multilingual Ability of Decoder-based Pre-trained Language Models: Finding and Controlling Language-Specific Neuronscited by 83
- 2022Reliability of CKA as a Similarity Measure in Deep Learningcited by 82
- 2025Large Language Models Share Representations of Latent Grammatical Concepts Across Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 57
- 2024Beneath the Surface of Consistency: Exploring Cross-lingual Knowledge Representation Sharing in LLMscited by 20
- 2025Unveiling Language-Specific Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 12
- 2025The Transfer Neurons Hypothesis: An Underlying Mechanism for Language Latent Space Transitions in Multilingual LLMscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Model Merging for Cross-Lingual Transfer in LLMs
- 2026Align to the Pivot: Dual Alignment with Self-Feedback for Multilingual Math Reasoning
- 2023Breaking Language Barriers in Multilingual Mathematical Reasoning: Insights and Observations
- 2026LLM Parameters for Math Across Languages: Shared or Separate?
- 2024Layer Swapping for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer in Large Language Models
- 2025Gradual Code-Switching as Inference-Time Cross-Lingual Representational Alignment for LLMs
- 2026Rethinking the Multilingual Reasoning Gap with Layer Swap
- 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders