Diversity-Based Active Learning: An Evaluation of Metric Spaces for Active Learning Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With rapid advancement over the last few years, many different methods are now widely used for classification. However, training these models requires substantial labeled data. Active Learning is a potential solution to this problem. Pool-based active learning minimizes costs by querying only the most informative samples from an unlabeled dataset. Diversity-based approaches, on the other hand, attempt to select a representative subset of the data. There are many different objectives for determining the selection process, including exact K-center, exact K-median, and Greedy K-center. In this paper, we will focus on evaluating the performance of Greedy K-center across a variety of metric spaces: the raw feature space, a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) space, and a model-derived probability space (with and without entropy-based weighting). Using Random Forest classifiers as a baseline evaluator, our empirical results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that mapping unlabeled instances into a predictive probability space and weighting the result by entropy often dominates the other options for active learning selection with Greedy K-center.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.
Builds on
1 of 12 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.