mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MediSkill-Evo: Process-Constrained Self-Evolution for Evidence-Grounded Clinical Interaction

arXiv 2608.23397 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interactive clinical agents operate under partial observability, so reliable care depends on reaching the correct diagnosis through evidence-grounded, safe interactions. Yet existing agents struggle to convert experience into reusable process knowledge with explicit provenance and authority. To address this gap, we introduce MediSkill-Evo, which self-evolves governed process knowledge without fine-tuning the backbone. It realizes this self-evolution by updating clinical, process, symbolic, and visual knowledge in four typed banks under type-specific validation and scope rules. The Process-Constrained Preference Harness then turns validated knowledge into action by grounding candidates in evidence and prioritizing safer decisions. We evaluate on 300 MIMIC-IV-derived FullChain encounters, 180 hard-isolation conditions covering six process obligations, and 100 multimodal NEJM image-diagnosis cases. On Qwen FullChain, MediSkill-Evo improves diagnosis accuracy by 7.81% and treatment-intent coverage by 70.67% over the best-performing prior agent, while reducing critical failures by 43.04%. Under stress, it improves the stress-process composite by 7.77% and required-action completion by 12.41% over the best-performing agent for each metric, with stronger patient-fact, temporal-evidence, and triage-red-flag recovery and no controller-scored errors in unavailable-evidence, treatment, and triage safety checks. On multimodal NEJM diagnosis, MediSkill-Evo with optional MedSAM localization improves diagnosis accuracy by 2.56% and core score by 18.96% over the best-performing memory agent. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/mediskill-evo_anonymous-68E7.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  2. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  3. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  4. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
  5. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 359
  6. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
  7. 2024AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environmentscited by 215
  8. 2025SkillWeaver: Web Agents can Self-Improve by Discovering and Honing Skillscited by 174
  9. 2024MMedAgent: Learning to Use Medical Tools with Multi-modal Agentcited by 108
  10. 2024AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulatorcited by 99
  11. 2023T-Eval: Evaluating the Tool Utilization Capability of Large Language Models Step by Stepcited by 91
  12. 2025MemBench: Towards More Comprehensive Evaluation on the Memory of LLM-based Agentscited by 82
4 more
  1. 2024EHRAgent: Code Empowers Large Language Models for Few-shot Complex Tabular Reasoning on Electronic Health Recordscited by 75
  2. 2025MEDDxAgent: A Unified Modular Agent Framework for Explainable Automatic Differential Diagnosiscited by 23
  3. 2024ReflecTool: Towards Reflection-Aware Tool-Augmented Clinical Agentscited by 20
  4. 20253MDBench: Medical Multimodal Multi-agent Dialogue Benchmarkcited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.