mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

POOL: Propagated Uncertainty Over Lookalikes

arXiv 2608.23086 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Black-box large language models need confidence scores that can separate likely-correct from likely-incorrect outputs, enabling systems to prioritize human review, route uncertain cases to stronger models, or choose abstention thresholds on development data. Yet existing confidence estimators face a cost-quality trade-off: verbal confidence is cheap but is often overconfident, while sampling-based uncertainty is more informative but scales linearly with the number of samples per query. We propose textscPOOL (Propagated Uncertainty Over Lookalikes),a cost-efficient framework that addresses this trade-off taking inspiration from group-testing.textscPOOL clusters query stems with overlaps, evaluates a base estimator on representative medoids, softly propagates confidence scores to nearby queries, and selectively evaluates high-disagreement cases. We instantiate this framework with textscHy@p, a hybrid estimator that combines verbal confidence with spectral answer diversity computed from the negative von Neumann entropy of sampled answer embeddings.Across six domains from three datasets and five black-box LLMs, textscHy@5 achieves higher average AUROC than verbal confidence and textscVn@10 sampling while using half as many samples as textscVn@10. textscPOOL-textscHy@5 retains 93.5--97.9% of its AUROC while saving 19.3--39.3% of generations. On paraphrase-dense workloads, generation savings rise to 73-76%, showing that semantic redundancy can be leveraged to lower confidence-estimation costs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 20 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  2. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  3. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  4. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
  5. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  6. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
  7. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  8. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
  9. 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 751
  10. 2024Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similaritiescited by 159
  11. 2024Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Onlycited by 65

Built on by

Not cited yet.