mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Closed-Loop Molecular Inverse Design with Semantic LLM Surrogates

arXiv 2608.22967 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Practical molecular inverse design is rarely a one-shot generation problem; it often involves enriching a pool of molecules that match a desired property profile under a limited oracle budget. Bayesian optimization (BO) offers a natural framework for this setting, with standard Gaussian-process (GP) surrogates operating in continuous embedding spaces. We propose LoopMol, a closed-loop framework whose large language model (LLM) surrogate reasons directly over task instructions, SMILES-level optimization histories, and oracle feedback. At each iteration, the surrogate selects informative reference molecules under an exploration--exploitation principle, optionally with a concise guidance sentence. These outputs condition the next generation round and yield an inspectable optimization trace. Experiments on six drug and material tasks across three Llamole backbones show that the LLM-based variant improves over one-shot generation and is competitive with or stronger than GP-based BO. They also reveal a domain-dependent interface: reference-only conditioning performs better on binary drug tasks, while adding a concise guidance sentence generally benefits continuous material tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.

Builds on

27 of 49 references.

References · 27

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  3. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  4. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
  5. 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 765
  6. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
  7. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 744
  8. 2018Junction Tree Variational Autoencoder for Molecular Graph Generationcited by 652
  9. 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 374
  10. 2018Graph Convolutional Policy Network for Goal-Directed Molecular Graph Generationcited by 364
  11. 2020ChemBERTa: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pretraining for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 337
  12. 2018GuacaMol: Benchmarking Models for De Novo Molecular Designcited by 297
15 more
  1. 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 285
  2. 2018Molecular Sets (MOSES): A Benchmarking Platform for Molecular Generation Modelscited by 275
  3. 2017Molecular De Novo Design through Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
  4. 2021Therapeutics Data Commons: Machine Learning Datasets and Tasks for Drug Discovery and Developmentcited by 264
  5. 2013Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddingscited by 182
  6. 2022Translation between Molecules and Natural Languagecited by 177
  7. 2022Multi-modal Molecule Structure-text Model for Text-based Retrieval and Editingcited by 166
  8. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning for De-Novo Drug Designcited by 161
  9. 2022Sample Efficiency Matters: A Benchmark for Practical Molecular Optimizationcited by 155
  10. 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 149
  11. 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 135
  12. 2021A survey on high-dimensional Gaussian process modeling with application to Bayesian optimizationcited by 77
  13. 2024Multimodal Large Language Models for Inverse Molecular Design with Retrosynthetic Planningcited by 29
  14. 2025A Survey of Large Language Models for Text-Guided Molecular Discovery: from Molecule Generation to Optimizationcited by 13
  15. 2025AOT*: Efficient Synthesis Planning via LLM-Empowered AND-OR Tree Searchcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.