Fairness-Aware Mixture-of-Experts via Subgroup Reweighting and Gate Regularization
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Expert routing strategies
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models often produce performance disparities across demographic groups, due to the training data imbalance with respect to sensitive attributes such as gender or age. To address this problem, existing work has explored fair representation learning, data re-sampling, and adversarial training, which can be broadly categorized into two main approaches. Single-stage methods typically learn a shared representation for fairness, but often struggle to handle heterogeneous subgroup distributions. Two-stage methods learn representations separately from the final prediction task, which can lead to misalignment between fairness objectives and downstream predictions. We identify routing-induced bias, a failure mode in which subgroup imbalance drives the gating network to route subgroups onto a few experts, and propose an end-to-end Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that corrects it. Specifically, we apply subgroup reweighting to correct data imbalance, and introduce gate entropy regularization to prevent routing from collapsing onto subgroup attributes, keeping expert utilization both balanced and interpretable. Beyond improving fairness, the routing distribution offers an interpretable view of how subgroups are allocated across experts. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Expert routing strategies, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2026.
Builds on
13 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Auxiliary-Loss-Free Load Balancing Strategy for Mixture-of-Experts28 Aug
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity11 Jan
Other references · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2022A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 102
- 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
- 2021Fair Feature Distillation for Visual Recognitioncited by 59
- 2024Multilinear Mixture of Experts: Scalable Expert Specialization through Factorizationcited by 28
- 2018Gradient Reversal Against Discriminationcited by 20
- 2024Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspectivecited by 10
- 2026SHaSaM: Submodular Hard Sample Mining for Fair Facial Attribute Recognitioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Hierarchical Mixture-of-Experts with Two-Stage Optimization
- 2025Robust Mixture Models for Algorithmic Fairness Under Latent Heterogeneity
- 2026φ-Balancing for Mixture-of-Experts Training
- 2026Routing Sensitivity Without Controllability: A Diagnostic Study of Fairness in MoE Language Models
- 2025Fairness-Aware Low-Rank Representation Fine-Tuning
- 2023Revisiting Single-gated Mixtures of Experts
- 2024Fair Distillation: Teaching Fairness from Biased Teachers in Medical Imaging
- 2024Beyond Parameter Count: Implicit Bias in Soft Mixture of Experts