The Variance of Thought: Policy Variance, Critical Forks, and Local Credit Assignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Long-horizon language-model tasks --- multi-step reasoning and tool-using agents alike --- are limited by credit assignment. We analyze it through the policy variance σπ2(s)=operatornameVara~π[Qπ(s,a)], which in a deterministic MDP is the sole source of return variance and is injected in discrete pulses at states we call critical forks. Three results follow. (i) Policy variance is a discovery budget: observing an action of advantage c requires Omega(c2/σπ2(s)) draws, a bound that is exact on the canonical two-point fork. (ii) Policy variance is bounded by the policy's Gini dispersion, σπ2(s)≤ 1-|π(·|s)|22, a rollout-free necessary condition for criticality computable from logits alone. (iii) The remaining horizon sets the estimation cost: at a fork whose downstream success probability is P, the Monte Carlo advantage estimate has signal-to-noise ratio of order √P, so its sample cost scales as 1/P --- a cost that branched sampling shares. Bootstrapping removes it by converting a product of survival probabilities into a sum, provided the value representation is multiplicatively accurate, which argues for log-value parameterization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2026.
Builds on
5 of 11 references.
References · 5
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
Built on by
Not cited yet.