The Communication Map of a Transformer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The components of a transformer communicate by writing to and reading from a shared residual stream, and the mechanistic interpretability literature has mapped these connections by hand, one circuit at a time. We present the communication map, which charts every potential communication channel from the geometry of the model's weights alone, generalizing the composition score of Elhage et al. (2021) into a single coupling coefficient covering all 18 connection classes, from head-to-head to neuron-to-neuron and everything in between. We provide an account of the properties of the coupling coefficient, including its geometric interpretation and its exact chance level. The census finds that 70-89% of head pairs are oriented far from chance, some coupled strongly and others actively avoiding each other. We demonstrate the communication map in two novel applications. In Application 1, we recover the known induction circuits blind from the strongest head-to-head couplings and group the heads into communities, and ablating one such community destroys the model's in-context copying. In Application 2, we pool the coupling coefficients of every head to identify a distinct two-dimensional residual stream subspace, whose deletion abolishes the induction capability in six models up to Pythia-6.9B. We show that this subspace is different from those identified by either activation PCA or outlier dimensions. We release the map, the statistical machinery, and the intervention suite.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2026.
Builds on
32 of 47 references.
References · 32
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 881
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
20 more
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 700
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
- 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discoverycited by 196
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
- 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
- 2023Does Circuit Analysis Interpretability Scale? Evidence from Multiple Choice Capabilities in Chinchillacited by 145
- 2023The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computationscited by 145
- 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 113
- 2021BERT Busters: Outlier Dimensions that Disrupt Transformerscited by 110
- 2024Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Modelscited by 100
- 2024A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 83
- 2024Talking Heads: Understanding Inter-layer Communication in Transformer Language Modelscited by 39
- 2026All Circuits Lead to Rome: Rethinking Functional Anisotropy in Circuit and Sheaf Discovery for LLMscited by 8
- 2026Conditional Co-Ablation: Recovering Self-Repair Backups in Transformer Circuitscited by 6
- 2026Measuring Affinity between Attention-Head Weight Subspaces via the Projection Kernelcited by 5
- 2026In-Context Learning Operates as Concept Subspace Learningcited by 3
- 2026Closure-Validated Circuit Discovery in Attention Heads: Co-activation Proposes, Ablation Disposescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.