mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Advantage-level Aggregation Reinforcement Learning for X-point Target Magnetic Configuration Control in an EXL-50U Experiment-Calibrated Simulation Environment

arXiv 2608.20834 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2026physics.plasm-ph cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for energy, networks and operations

Abstract (arXiv)

Managing divertor heat loads is a central challenge for compact, high-power tokamaks. To increase local flux expansion and decouple the dissipation volume from the core, EHL-2 adopts the X-point target (XPT) divertor. This requires the secondary X-point to remain on the divertor leg; displacement degrades the topology and exhaust geometry. Current experiments, including EXL-50U discharges, rely on precomputed feedforward waveforms with PID loops on global quantities. Lacking dedicated closed-loop feedback for the secondary null, XPT operation is repeatable but not routine. We formulate XPT feedback as a multi-objective reinforcement learning (RL) control problem in a free-boundary environment calibrated to EXL-50U discharge #13906. To address strong coupling among plasma current, shape, and null constraints - where reward scalarisation collapses objective-specific temporal credit - we develop Advantage Aggregation (AdvA). AdvA preserves objective-wise temporal credit before worst-objective-aware nonlinear scalarisation and introduces a residual correction to policy updates. AdvA-PPO is evaluated against Reward-PPO and a feedforward-plus-PID baseline under nominal operation, measurement uncertainties, and unseen initial equilibria. On a 500 ms rollout, AdvA-PPO raises the mean worst-channel score from 0.23 to 0.81 over Reward-PPO, reducing X-point flux RMSE by ~20x. Under combined measurement uncertainties, it is the only learned controller completing the horizon while retaining a usable XPT shape. Multi-initialization fine-tuning enables a single AdvA-PPO policy to complete full-horizon operation across divertor and limiter initial equilibria. These results provide a simulation-based foundation for future real-time XPT validation on EXL-50U.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 4 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.

Builds on

4 of 29 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  2. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  3. 2023Towards practical reinforcement learning for tokamak magnetic controlcited by 9
  4. 2025Scalable Multi-Objective Robot Reinforcement Learning through Gradient Conflict Resolutioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Offline Reinforcement Learning for Plasma Control in Nuclear Fusion: Codebase and Benchmark
  2. 2025Gym-TORAX: Open-source software for integrating reinforcement learning with plasma control simulators in tokamak research
  3. 2026Offline Reinforcement Learning for Rotation Profile Control in Tokamaks
  4. 2024Active Disruption Avoidance and Trajectory Design for Tokamak Ramp-downs with Neural Differential Equations and Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026Dynamic Plasma Shape Control with Arbitrary Sensor Subsets ↗
  6. 2025Learning Plasma Dynamics and Robust Rampdown Trajectories with Predict-First Experiments at TCV
  7. 2025Plasma Shape Control via Zero-shot Generative Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2025Enabling Integrated AI Control on DIII-D: A Control System Design with State-of-the-art Experiments