mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Speculation for Faster Reasoning Models

arXiv 2608.20359 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are deployed for increasingly complex tasks involving planning and multi-step decision making, but high-quality performance on these tasks often requires generating long reasoning traces. This is a poor fit for latency-sensitive and interactive applications like voice assistants or coding agents, where generation latency can strongly affect user experience. Existing acceleration methods typically focus on token-level generation, without utilizing the structure of reasoning workflows. We introduce SSR: Self-Speculation for Reasoning Models, a training-free self-speculative decoding method that leverages the chain-of-thought (CoT) as a source of speculation. SSR uses the partial-CoT answer distribution as the drafter and the full-CoT distribution as the verifier, deriving both from the same model at different reasoning budgets. This builds on the observation that later partial-CoT responses often exhibit greater semantic and lexical overlap with the full-budget response. Due to this overlap, SSR can accept long draft prefixes at once, leading to large speedups on structured and long-form generation tasks. To further exploit draft-response overlap beyond the contiguous prefix accepted by standard speculative decoding, SSR also incorporates suffix decoding, using the draft to seed a suffix cache and recover useful spans beyond the accepted prefix, further reducing latency on tasks with high lexical overlap between the draft and the final response. We evaluate SSR on multiple structured and long-form generation tasks where it is most useful, and demonstrate a relative improvement of up to 24.1% on total generation latency for popular open-source models such as Qwen3.5 and Gemma-4.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

11 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Accelerating Large-Scale Reasoning Model Inference with Sparse Self-Speculative Decoding1 Dec
  2. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug

Other references · 9

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  2. 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Samplingcited by 1,006
  3. 2026Qwen3.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 174
  4. 2023ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generationcited by 168
  5. 2024TriForce: Lossless Acceleration of Long Sequence Generation with Hierarchical Speculative Decodingcited by 102
  6. 2024SuffixDecoding: Extreme Speculative Decoding for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 36
  7. 2025LongProc: Benchmarking Long-Context Language Models on Long Procedural Generationcited by 29
  8. 2025Speeding up Speculative Decoding via Sequential Approximate Verificationcited by 11
  9. 2026Vegas: Self-Speculative Decoding with Verification-Guided Sparse Attentioncited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024SEED: Accelerating Reasoning Tree Construction via Scheduled Speculative Decoding
  2. 2025SSR: Speculative Parallel Scaling Reasoning in Test-time
  3. 2025Early Stopping Chain-of-thoughts in Large Language Models
  4. 2025Scaling Up, Speeding Up: A Benchmark of Speculative Decoding for Efficient LLM Test-Time Scaling
  5. 2025Self-Reasoning Language Models: Unfold Hidden Reasoning Chains with Few Reasoning Catalyst
  6. 2026Enhancing reasoning accuracy in large language models during inference time
  7. 2025Speculative Thinking: Enhancing Small-Model Reasoning with Large Model Guidance at Inference Time
  8. 2026Acceptance Dynamics Across Cognitive Domains in Speculative Decoding