Physical-Support Confidence Sets for Highly Coherent Dictionaries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse pursuit after dictionary learning can yield a precise atom support even when its physical interpretation is not justified by the calibration data, especially for highly coherent dictionaries where alternative calibration-compatible dictionaries may assign different physical meanings to the same selected support. We develop resolution-aware physical-support inference that jointly accounts for uncertainty in the learned dictionary and in the representation of a deployment signal. Our cross-dictionary confidence correspondence retains calibration-compatible dictionaries and deployment-compatible sparse representations, then projects the surviving explanations onto physical-support space. For local coherent-atom classes with separation scale s, once the deployment data resolve the coherent-block explanation and its atom support, the minimax physical resolution from N calibration signals satisfies δopt(N,s)asympmins,frac1√Ns2, with relative resolution governed by the orientation-information scale Ns6. Deployment replication improves physical localization only when orientation changes cannot be absorbed by adjusting the active coefficients. For computation, we introduce active endpoint bracketing (AEB), an adaptive finite-bank procedure that evaluates only candidates that can still affect the physical report and otherwise safely coarsens or abstains. Finite-bank experiments, including a four-region synthetic application, show that a point-valued plug-in selector can be physically overprecise, whereas AEB avoids unsupported refinement with fewer candidate evaluations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.
Builds on
0 of 19 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.