mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inject, Align, Recover: Staged Post-Training for Retrieval-Free Document Knowledge Internalization

arXiv 2608.20281 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models often fail to answer questions about a bounded document collection when the source documents are not retrieved at inference time. We study this setting as document knowledge internalization: converting a fixed corpus into usable parametric knowledge for retrieval-free question answering. We propose IAR (Inject, Align, and Recover), a three-stage post-training framework that separates structured document knowledge injection, QA behavior alignment, and general ability recovery. Unlike conventional continued pretraining, Inject converts source documents into continuation, rewrite, and instruction-conditioned reconstruction objectives. Align then adapts the injected model with answer-only QA supervision, while Recover merges the domain-adapted model with the base instruction model to recover general capabilities. Across Common Corpus (CC) and CCI, and across Llama, Phi, Qwen, and SmolLM model families, IAR improves the domain-primary domain-general frontier for retrieval-free document internalization. In the main comparison, IAR improves over Vanilla SFT on all four reported metrics in 7 of 8 dataset-model settings, with average gains of 3.6 percentage points in domain QA accuracy and 12.1 percentage points in mean general performance across IFEval, MMLU, and MSBench. Extended CC baselines show that LoRA and FAPM can win individual general metrics, but among methods that also reach leading or near-leading domain internalization, IAR retains one of the strongest general profiles.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2026.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  4. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  5. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  6. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
  7. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
  8. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
  9. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 621
  10. 2023Evaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 242
  11. 2023Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMscited by 178
  12. 2024Instruction-tuned Language Models are Better Knowledge Learnerscited by 55
3 more
  1. 2025Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 55
  2. 2024Self-Tuning: Instructing LLMs to Effectively Acquire New Knowledge through Self-Teachingcited by 17
  3. 2025Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models with Forgetting-aware Pruningcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021End-to-End Training of Multi-Document Reader and Retriever for Open-Domain Question Answering
  2. 2025MLP Memory: A Retriever-Pretrained Memory for Large Language Models
  3. 2024Towards Better Generalization in Open-Domain Question Answering by Mitigating Context Memorization
  4. 2024REAR: A Relevance-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Open-Domain Question Answering
  5. 2026Data Quality over Capacity: Internalizing Documents into LoRA Adapters for Closed-Book QA
  6. 2024Refiner: Restructure Retrieval Content Efficiently to Advance Question-Answering Capabilities
  7. 2026Wnuan: Staged Post-Training for Question Answering over Proprietary Enterprise Knowledge
  8. 2026Inferential Question Answering