From Threat Intelligence to Detection: Knowledge-driven Enrichment and Template-based Rule Grounding for Automated Sigma Rule Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mechanisms for dynamically converting cyber threat intelligence (CTI) into actionable detection capabilities are necessary due to the rapid evolution of Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). Sigma rules are an essential part of contemporary threat detection workflows because they offer a platform-independent framework for expressing detection logic that can be converted into particular queries across SIEM systems. Conventional techniques for manually crafting Sigma rules are prone to mistakes, and necessitate extensive knowledge, which restricts their scalability. Although there are open-source and industry-maintained Sigma rule repositories, they often fail to keep pace with emerging threats and require frequent customization to fit diverse operational environments. This emphasizes the necessity of dynamic rule generation that is adapted to evolving attack techniques as well as particular use cases. In this work, we design AUTOSIGMA, an automated solution for transforming unstructured CTI reports into relevant Sigma rules. Rather than relying solely on language models, AUTOSIGMA leverages a structured knowledge base to enrich partial inputs, matches the enriched content against a repository of existing Sigma rules, and then employs an LLM-as-a-Judge mechanism to iteratively validate the rules. By combining knowledge-driven enrichment, template-based rule grounding, and a multi-stage solution, AUTOSIGMA enables accurate, context-aware, and relevant rule generation. Evaluations across multiple real-world APT reports and multiple security blogs demonstrate that AUTOSIGMA outperforms alternative solutions and LLM models in rule validity, rule relevancy, MITRE ATT&CK technique coverage, and robustness to input quality. AUTOSIGMA's Demo: https://youtu.be/iSr6IurQ6BM
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.
Builds on
12 of 55 references.
References · 12
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2024LLMCloudHunter: Harnessing LLMs for Automated Extraction of Detection Rules from Cloud-Based CTIcited by 18
- 2024Actionable Cyber Threat Intelligence using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2024CyberPal.AI: Empowering LLMs with Expert-Driven Cybersecurity Instructionscited by 12
- 2025A New HOPE: Domain-agnostic Automatic Evaluation of Text Chunkingcited by 7
- 2024An Interview Study on Third-Party Cyber Threat Hunting Processes in the U.S. Department of Homeland Securitycited by 3
- 2025SHIELD: APT Detection and Intelligent Explanation Using LLMcited by 3
- 2022Attack Tactic Identification by Transfer Learning of Language Modelcited by 1
- 2025Automated Attack Testflow Extraction from Cyber Threat Report using BERT for Contextual Analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.