mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fuzzy Accuracy Compensates for Label Subjectivity in Classification of Skin Tone Using Wearable Photoplethysmography Signals

arXiv 2608.18969 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of classification of skin tone using photoplethysmography (PPG) signals with labels of the ordinal six-class Fitzpatrick skin tones. A typical accuracy for this task is a poor 40-55 %. However, the labels are subjectively determined by comparing the skin with a colour chart, and hence contain widespread small-scale inaccuracies. By working with a "fuzzy accuracy", which deems a prediction of skin tone class to be correct if its difference from the labelled class is not greater than one, much higher accuracy is obtained which provides more convincing evidence that skin tone can be accurately predicted from PPG signals. Three machine learning approaches were used, namely deep learning or tree-based approaches on raw PPG signals, deep learning on image representations of the signals generated by the Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction (SPAR) method, and machine learning on features extracted from the signals. The first method also employed a fuzzy version of the cross entropy loss function, which gave the best results. Tree-based models on raw signals give accuracies up to 55 % and higher fuzzy accuracies up to 96 %, while deep learning models on the SPAR images obtained lower results of 44 % accuracy and 85 % fuzzy accuracy. The machine learning on PPG features gave similar results to the SPAR method with accuracy of 42 % and fuzzy accuracy of 87 %. We have shown that classification of skin tone using PPG signals is possible with high fuzzy accuracy which implies that our modelling approach enables accurate prediction of skin tone class within at most one class of the observer's choice of class, from which we conclude that PPG signals are affected by skin tone in a discernible way.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.

Builds on

8 of 30 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 156
  2. 2022Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 96
  3. 2016Squared Earth Mover's Distance-based Loss for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 45
  4. 2021Analysis of Manual and Automated Skin Tone Assignments for Face Recognition Applicationscited by 16
  5. 2022Yggdrasil Decision Forests: A Fast and Extensible Decision Forests Librarycited by 13
  6. 2025Machine-learning for photoplethysmography analysis: Benchmarking feature, image, and signal-based approachescited by 8
  7. 2024Ordinal-Aware Calibration for Ordinal Classificationcited by 3
  8. 2017RIDDLE: Race and ethnicity Imputation from Disease history with Deep LEarningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.