mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Distance-Based Graph Autoencoders with Structural Penalties for Dynamic Graph Embedding

arXiv 2608.18762 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.ETcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph autoencoders (GAEs) are widely used for learning representations of dynamic graphs. However, their optimisation objectives typically do not take structural heterogeneity across nodes into account. We propose three distance-based GAE variants that incorporate structural penalties into the reconstruction loss. All variants share a two-layer Graph Convolutional Network encoder and a Euclidean-distance decoder trained with distance-based reconstruction objectives. We extend sparsity-corrected loss with two node-level regularization terms: (i) a hub penalty based on degree centrality, and (ii) a penalty based on Natural Community Local Intrinsic Dimensionality (NC-LID). The paper is motivated by prior evidence linking high NC-LID to reduced embedding quality. The proposed methods are designed to emphasize reconstruction errors for structurally ambiguous nodes. Experiments on multiple dynamic graph data sets show that incorporating NC-LID-based regularization consistently improves reconstruction performance over the baseline without structural regularization and the method using hub-aware regularization. These findings highlight NC-LID as a useful structural signal for enhancing distance-based graph autoencoders in dynamic settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 19 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
  3. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,547
  4. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,382
  5. 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 832
  6. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 684
  7. 2022A Survey on Graph Representation Learning Methodscited by 66
  8. 2021A Survey on Embedding Dynamic Graphscited by 60
  9. 2018dynnode2vec: Scalable Dynamic Network Embeddingcited by 32
  10. 2017STWalk: Learning Trajectory Representations in Temporal Graphscited by 3
  11. 2022Local Intrinsic Dimensionality Measures for Graphs, with Applications to Graph Embeddingscited by 3
  12. 2022Hub-aware Random Walk Graph Embedding Methods for Classificationcited by 2
2 more
  1. 2024Local Intrinsic Dimensionality for Dynamic Graph Embeddingscited by 1
  2. 2025Dynamic Graph Embedding Through Hub-aware Random Walkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.