A Locally Deployable Tool-Grounded LLM Multi-agent Framework for Automating Methane Emission Analysis and Reporting
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Methane field monitoring requires the integration of sampling design, meteorological interpretation, sensor processing, plume analysis, visualization, and reporting, but these steps are often distributed across separate expert-driven workflows. We developed a locally deployable, tool-grounded large language model (LLM) multi-agent framework for our low-cost methane sensing and field-monitoring campaigns. The framework uses LLM agents as workflow coordinators that link field measurements, meteorological data, deterministic sensor-processing routines, Gaussian plume inversion, and report generation, rather than directly estimating methane concentrations or emissions. Extensive field deployments across diverse real-world environments (e.g., wastewater treatment facilities, landfills, and oil and gas sites) demonstrate that our framework can achieve 92.0% accuracy in workflow routing and parameter extraction, 85.0% success in emission-rate estimation and plume prediction, and 95.0% success in generating editable reports under practical operating conditions. Compared with manual and general-purpose LLM-assisted workflows, it reduced workflow time from hours-level to minutes-level, lowered manual coordination and prompt-engineering requirements, and retained traceable plume-based outputs. In addition, most processing can be performed locally, reducing exposure of sensitive facility and field data to cloud services. These results indicate that tool-grounded LLM coordination can reduce the time, labor, usability, and data-security barriers of methane field monitoring.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2026.
Builds on
12 of 50 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,395
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 525
- 2024LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Challenges and Open Problemscited by 120
- 2024Exploration of LLM Multi-Agent Application Implementation Based on LangGraph+CrewAIcited by 35
- 2024A Middle Path for On-Premises LLM Deployment: Preserving Privacy Without Sacrificing Model Confidentialitycited by 8
- 2025AIMNET: An IoT-Empowered Digital Twin for Continuous Gas Emission Monitoring and Early Hazard Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Exploring Robust Multi-Agent Workflows for Environmental Data Management
- 2026A Cloud-based Multi-Agentic Workflow for Science
- 2024Domain-specific ReAct for physics-integrated iterative modeling: A case study of LLM agents for gas path analysis of gas turbines
- 2025CLIMATEAGENT: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Complex Climate Data Science Workflows
- 2025Automating Data-Driven Modeling and Analysis for Engineering Applications using Large Language Model Agents
- 2025Geo-OLM: Enabling Sustainable Earth Observation Studies with Cost-Efficient Open Language Models & State-Driven Workflows
- 2026ST-Bench: A Spatial-Temporal Benchmark for Multi-Agent System Generation on Scientific Research Tasks
- 2026The Energy Footprint of LLM-Based Environmental Analysis: LLMs and Domain Products