Vision-Language Models for Analog Gauge Reading: An Empirical Study of Specialization, Transfer and Reliability
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Chart understanding and anomaly detection
Abstract (arXiv)
Analog gauges remain common in industrial environments where manual inspection is costly or hazardous. The engineering application addressed here is direct numerical reading of single-target analog-gauge images, while the artificial-intelligence contribution is a systematic evaluation of specialization, transfer, robustness and reliability for a general-purpose vision-language model (VLM) without an explicit pointer-segmentation and geometric-reading pipeline. The Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct model is evaluated using zero-shot prompting, in-context learning (ICL) and parameter-efficient fine-tuning with Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) on a public synthetic dataset, a video-derived Pressure Gauge dataset and a proprietary industrial dataset. All fine-tuning experiments use a fixed 20-epoch protocol with the final epoch used for analysis; separate models with and without supplied gauge ranges remove prompt-setting confounds. The primary metric is range-normalized mean percentage error (MPE). The best fine-tuned MPE values are 2.39% on the synthetic dataset, with a 95% bootstrap confidence interval (CI) of 1.43-3.90%; 2.61% on the Pressure Gauge dataset, with a CI of 1.66-3.80%; and 4.43% on the proprietary industrial dataset, with a CI of 2.31-7.14%. Leave-one-dataset-out experiments reveal substantial transfer degradation on held-out synthetic and proprietary data, while robustness tests identify Gaussian blur as the strongest tested corruption. Reliability analysis shows that high-confidence errors remain possible, motivating abstention and independent validation in safety-critical use. These results support QLoRA-specialized VLMs for direct single-gauge reading but not yet a deployment-ready plant-monitoring pipeline.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 5 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.
Builds on
5 of 24 references.
References · 5
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2024An Introduction to Vision-Language Modelingcited by 178
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Lost in Motion: Vision Language Models Fail the Dynamic Gauges Test
- 2026InSituMeasure: Probing Situated Measurement Grounding in Industrial Scenes with Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Do Vision-Language Models Measure Up? Benchmarking Visual Measurement Reading with MeasureBench
- 2026Zero-Shot Learning in Industrial Scenarios: New Large-Scale Benchmark, Challenges and Baseline
- 2026Adapting Vision-Language Models for Human-Readable XAI in Industrial Object Detection
- 2026Answer-Conditioned Chain-of-Thought Distillation for Few-Shot Industrial Vision with Small VLMs
- 2025VSCBench: Bridging the Gap in Vision-Language Model Safety Calibration
- 2025InspectVLM: Unified in Theory, Unreliable in Practice