CORAM: Coherent Orthogonal Rotation for Model Merging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Merging finetuned models combines specialized capabilities without joint training or access to the original data. Most methods operate by linear arithmetic in Euclidean weight space, which cannot carry the geometry of the update. Orthogonal Model Merging (OrthoMerge) uses a single orthogonal transform for each weight matrix, but such a transform cannot change singular values. We propose CORAM, which partitions each target matrix into row slices, represents every expert slice by its singular value decomposition in the corresponding base-model SVD frame, and merges the task-specific factors on their corresponding manifolds. Because manifold averaging contracts the merged update, CORAM applies an amplification coefficient λ=kappahatc. The scale chat is estimated from the expert and merged update norms and is approximately √N for N experts with comparable update magnitudes. The restoration strength kappa is selected from the dispersion of expert updates without evaluating candidate merged models. This rule remains within 0.72 points of the best swept value on all evaluated suites. CORAM also includes spread slicing to distribute highly updated rows across slices and a residual pathway for non-target layers. Across four suites covering three model families, 3B to 9B scales, and language and vision-language experts, CORAM improves over OrthoMerge by 0.25 to 1.35 points and matches or exceeds the strongest weight-space baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.
Builds on
25 of 38 references.
References · 25
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
- 2020PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 467
- 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 466
13 more
- 2022Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetriescited by 460
- 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 384
- 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
- 2023Controlling Text-to-Image Diffusion by Orthogonal Finetuningcited by 207
- 2023ZipIt! Merging Models from Different Tasks without Trainingcited by 178
- 2025MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligencecited by 169
- 2024Task Singular Vectors: Reducing Task Interference in Model Mergingcited by 143
- 2024Model merging with SVD to tie the Knotscited by 118
- 2025No Task Left Behind: Isotropic Model Merging with Common and Task-Specific Subspacescited by 90
- 2024Model Stock: All we need is just a few fine-tuned modelscited by 87
- 2024What Matters for Model Merging at Scale?cited by 52
- 2024Localize-and-Stitch: Efficient Model Merging via Sparse Task Arithmeticcited by 50
- 2025MergeBench: A Benchmark for Merging Domain-Specialized LLMscited by 30
Built on by
Not cited yet.