mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning latent progression states from spatial heterogeneity in uterine histopathology

arXiv 2608.17337 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.ETcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tumor progression is accompanied by changes in architecture, morphology and microenvironmental organization, yet progression-associated heterogeneity is usually compressed into static diagnostic categories in histopathology. Here we present SpaTIE, a uterus-specific computational pathology framework that learns morphology-aware representations and organizes spatial histopathological heterogeneity into progression-associated tumor states. SpaTIE was developed using 10,426 uterine hematoxylin and eosin whole-slide images and evaluated in TCGA-UCEC and TCGA-UCS cohorts. The learned representations formed morphology manifolds, supported diagnostic, molecular and survival-related prediction tasks, and localized attention to informative tumor regions. Beyond supervised prediction, SpaTIE inferred tumor-state axes from cross-sectional morphology without temporal or molecular supervision. These morphology-derived states were spatially coherent and showed associations with clinicopathological variables and survival outcomes, while not simply recapitulating staging or diagnostic labels. Integrative multi-omics analyses linked the inferred states to DNA methylation, somatic copy-number variation, mutation, RNA-seq and RPPA profiles, highlighting molecular programs related to chromatin regulation, copy-number-associated structural variation, receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, cell adhesion, extracellular-matrix remodeling and metabolic adaptation. Progression-guided virtual perturbation further prioritized molecular features coupled to the morphology-derived state organization. Together, these findings suggest that uterine histopathology contains recoverable progression-associated tumor-state information and establish SpaTIE as a framework for connecting spatial morphology with multi-omics-informed tumor-state discovery.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 46 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  5. 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 745
  6. 2018From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communitiescited by 385
  7. 2024Multimodal Whole Slide Foundation Model for Pathologycited by 162
  8. 2023Virchow: A Million-Slide Digital Pathology Foundation Modelcited by 90
  9. 2024A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Modelscited by 66
  10. 2024How to Build the Virtual Cell with Artificial Intelligence: Priorities and Opportunitiescited by 57
  11. 2024Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathologycited by 49
  12. 2024Deep Generative Classification of Blood Cell Morphologycited by 4
2 more
  1. 2025Subspecialty-Specific Foundation Model for Intelligent Gastrointestinal Pathologycited by 2
  2. 2026GloPath: An Entity-Centric Foundation Model for Glomerular Lesion Assessment and Clinicopathological Insightscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.