mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Image Dataset Quality Assurance in Multi-Center Breast MRI

arXiv 2608.16725 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Corrupted, inconsistent, or anomalous data silently threatens the safety and reliability of medical AI. Despite growing regulatory recognition of dataset quality assurance (QA) for high-risk medical AI, scalable automated detection remains underdeveloped. We employ unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) and out-of-distribution (OOD) detection as an automated dataset QA mechanism for multi-center dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. We build a controlled AD benchmark of 17 realistic QA-relevant anomaly types from six public datasets (protocol violations, processing errors, incorrect anatomical regions) and propose a taxonomy of radiological image anomalies based on human visual perception, enabling fine-grained analysis of AD failure modes. The benchmark includes near-, medium-far-, far-OOD samples, as well as in-distribution and external normal data. Four methods are evaluated: a projection-based method extended with a domain-specific feature extractor and a novel positional encoding, a reconstruction-based approach extended to full 3D volumes with an augmented training objective, and two unmodified hybrid OOD detection methods. Medium-far- and far-OOD samples are detected reliably, whereas near-OOD samples and external normal data from unseen institutions expose method-specific differences. The 3D reconstruction-based approach best balances detection performance (AUROC: 0.936) and generalization to unseen institutions. The projection-based method with positional encoding achieves the highest overall detection performance (AUROC: 0.954). Both hybrid methods exhibit critical failure modes, confirming that methods validated for one modality or anatomy may not generalize without domain-specific adaptation. Implants and mastectomies remain an open challenge for all methods. Our results establish a foundation and practical guidance on scalable unsupervised QA in medical AI pipelines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 38 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  2. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
  3. 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
  4. 2023Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 148
  5. 2021Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging -- A Mini Reviewcited by 44
  6. 2023Overcoming Data Scarcity in Biomedical Imaging with a Foundational Multi-Task Modelcited by 40
  7. 2020Soft-IntroVAE: Analyzing and Improving the Introspective Variational Autoencodercited by 23
  8. 2023Unsupervised 3D out-of-distribution detection with latent diffusion modelscited by 22
  9. 2022A Survey on Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Industrial Imagescited by 21
  10. 2022Transformer-based out-of-distribution detection for clinically safe segmentationcited by 16
  11. 2024The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic reviewcited by 13
  12. 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 9
2 more
  1. 2024Tissue Concepts: supervised foundation models in computational pathologycited by 8
  2. 2024Towards Universal Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Medical Imagingcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.