Time to Reason: Scalable Neurosymbolic Learning for LTLf via Fuzzy Semantics
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Neurosymbolic (NeSy) Artificial Intelligence aims to integrate Deep Learning (DL) architectures with symbolic reasoning. While initial NeSy approaches have targeted mainly symbolic reasoning in propositional and first-order logics, recent works have started to address the construction of neurosymbolic frameworks for Temporal Logics, and in particular for LTLf. These approaches have established temporal NeSy as a promising research direction, laying the foundations for learning under temporal constraints. Nonetheless, they leave many questions unanswered. From a theoretical perspective, several differentiable semantics for interpreting LTLf have been proposed but have not yet been formally and systematically defined within a unified framework. Moreover, existing approaches commonly rely on automata to represent temporal knowledge, resulting in limited scalability. Motivated by this research gap, this paper provides the following contributions: (i) formally defining different fuzzy semantics for LTLf, and systematically analysing theoretical properties regarding equivalences and dualities of temporal operators; (ii) showing how these semantics can be directly integrated within a novel NeSy framework, called DiffLTLf, enabling flexible and scalable learning without relying on the usage of automata; and (iii) introducing a novel evaluation protocol of increased complexity of learning tasks w.r.t. existing benchmarks. Our results show that the choice of fuzzy semantics has a significant impact on predictive performance. Moreover, DiffLTLf achieves performance on par with, and sometimes superior to, state-of-the-art probabilistic approaches while substantially improving scalability. Taken together, these results establish direct fuzzy interpretations as a competitive and scalable alternative to existing temporal NeSy frameworks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
0 of 33 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Neurosymbolic Learning of Interpretable World Modelscited by 0
- 2026Neurosymbolic Learning of Interpretable World Models14 Oct 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024NeSyA: Neurosymbolic Automata
- 2026DeepDFA: Injecting Temporal Logic in Deep Learning for Sequential Subsymbolic Applications
- 2022Is Neuro-Symbolic AI Meeting its Promise in Natural Language Processing? A Structured Review
- 2025Reasoning in Neurosymbolic AI
- 2026The RAIL Principles for Neurosymbolic AI: Reasoning, Assurances, Interfacing and Learning
- 2025A Comparative Study of Neurosymbolic AI Approaches to Interpretable Logical Reasoning
- 2026Differentiable Logic Programming to Mitigate Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Systems
- 2025Improving Rule-based Reasoning in LLMs using Neurosymbolic Representations