Dynamic Evidence Collection Ecosystem for Assessment Integrity and Authentic Competence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can produce high-quality essays, code, and design artefacts, challenging the validity of conventional assessments that rely on single-point submissions and product-only grading. This paper proposes a design framework called "Dynamic Evidence Collection Ecosystem" that shifts assessment toward continuous, authentic, multi-source evidence of student learning over time. The framework collects process evidence through iterative artefacts, design logs, activity rounds, self-reflection, and peer collaboration, supported by an AI-enabled layer for learning analytics, formative feedback, and transparency. The approach is grounded in recent assessment-redesign scholarship in AI-rich contexts and aligned with contemporary views of authenticity in assessment. This paper builds on the hypothesis that academic integrity is strengthened when it is treated as an assessment design rather than as an AI detection problem. The tools have limitations and risks of use that carry academic penalties. This paper presents an implementation scenario to support institutional adoption.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
3 of 29 references.
References · 3
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
- 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
- 2023Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Textcited by 90
Built on by
Not cited yet.