mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Geometry of Forgetting: Representation Flux in Continual Learning

arXiv 2608.15854 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Catastrophic forgetting remains a fundamental obstacle to continual learning, where neural networks lose previously acquired knowledge while learning new tasks. Existing methods primarily mitigate forgetting through parameter regularization or experience replay, while the representation-space dynamics associated with forgetting remain less understood. We investigate latent representation evolution during sequential learning and introduce representation flux, a geometric measure of sample-level representation displacement across training. We show that representation flux is strongly associated with catastrophic forgetting across multiple benchmarks, with temporal analyses indicating that elevated flux can precede subsequent performance degradation. Representation displacement is also associated with confidence degradation, while complementary geometric properties provide additional information about sample-level forgetting. Motivated by these observations, we propose FlowLess-R, a representation-space regularization method that constrains replay representations relative to stored references while allowing continued learning. FlowLess-R is architecture-agnostic and integrates into replay-based methods through a representation-matching term. Experiments on SplitMNIST, SplitFashionMNIST, SplitCIFAR10, and SplitTinyImageNet show improved final average accuracy and reduced forgetting with ER, DER++, and ER-ACE. Our results identify representation flux as an informative geometric marker of forgetting and show that stabilizing latent representations provides a simple strategy for mitigating catastrophic forgetting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2026.

Builds on

18 of 32 references.

References · 18

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  5. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
  6. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
  7. 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
  8. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  9. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
  10. 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 911
  11. 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
  12. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
6 more
  1. 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 681
  2. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  3. 2021New Insights on Reducing Abrupt Representation Change in Online Continual Learningcited by 219
  4. 2022Class-Incremental Learning by Knowledge Distillation with Adaptive Feature Consolidationcited by 113
  5. 2022Learning Bayesian Sparse Networks with Full Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 29
  6. 2017Less-forgetful Learning for Domain Expansion in Deep Neural Networkscited by 27

Built on by

Not cited yet.